Abstract:

There are numerous methods written at professional or amateur level for linking teaching. The absence of a particular common teaching model among these methods is often a situation that is encountered. Therefore, it is possible to say that a certain standard for the teaching of connectivity in the methods of connectivity is not provided. In addition to the absence of a common teaching model in the linking methods, the works found in these methods can also be seen in many aspects. The study has compared the two common samples of the Railroad and the Railroad and the Railroad and the Railroad and the Railroad and the Railroad and the Railroad and the Railroad. The research is aimed at identifying the situation and demonstrates an imaginary character. As a result, it has been found that in the methods of linking examined, two samples of work showed differences in terms of rating and adaptation, these differences arise from personal executive interpretations. It is also achieved the results by the linking executives that the works are differently learned and taught and that the executive unity in the collective linking institutions is not provided. The research has made recommendations on the differences in rating and adaptation in the methods of association with action from the results achieved.

Keywords: