Özet:

In the 21st century, the concept of traditional public administration began to change. The transition from representative democracy to participating democracy has accelerated and the fact of governance has emerged. The administration used in the sense of joint governance can be defined as informing the public about the decision-making processes and even playing a role in the decision-making mechanisms, along with civil society organizations. Since local governments, especially municipalities, are perceived as an appropriate administrative unit to carry out the participation of the people in the public administration, the legislator, in recent years, has done important work on local participating democracy. 2005 and the Municipal Law No. 5393 have been implemented by a number of administrative tools. One of them is the city councils. City councils carry out their activities in order to implement the understanding of governance, by the General Assembly, which is the competent body, by making decisions in the form of advice. In this study, the City Council’s general assembly decisions are subject to a broad assessment. First, the scope of the City Council decisions is examined and then the effectiveness of the City Council decisions is assessed. This study has a theoretical quality. The doctrine has done many studies on the city council, but the nature, legal structure and impact of the city council decisions have been limitedly studied. For the purpose of removing this lack, this work has been taken into mind.

Anahtar Kelimeler: