Abstract:

The claims of sovereignty over the sea borders and its hydrocarbon activities have made the Mediterranean a critical center. The Mediterranean is only 0.7 percent of the world's oceans. As the Mediterranean, Asia, Europe, the Affica transit area, it is the region on the edge of India, the Red Sea and the Atlantic Ocean. The diplomacy of Turkey’s neglecting the areas of maritime authority in the Mediterranean is essentially a part of the pressure and forcing techniques on Turkey. The influence of the sea areas on the country’s future and power is undisputed. Therefore, in the Eastern Mediterranean, the unilateral hydrocarbon activities of the Southern Cyprus Rum Administration and the maritime border claims of these areas of activity must be evaluated together in terms of international law. This is a dispute matter. To say, the impact of hydrocarbon studies in the conflict of marine law on the determination of the marine border is a sensitive topic of discussion. Southern Cyprus’s so-called maritime border claims are derived from claims of excess maritime areas in the context of the issue of Cyprus not being solved and the principles of restriction of maritime law in the domestic law are defined as well. GKRY has designed its own domestic law in terms of restriction in violation of the United Nations Convention on Maritime Law and the relevant law on drinking. In this context, the study points out that the relevant claims of the GKRY are not valid in international law, and they are involved in actions that will generate international responsibility with their personal worsening steps. The conclusion of the study was that GKRY’s internal legislation in violation of the nature of the maritime law was 301. It is emphasized that it is formed outside of the article and that its relevant policies enable international responsibility in accordance with the jokes referred to in Articles 74(3) and 83(3).

Keywords: