Abstract:

When the international agreements, which are the main source of international law, are examined, it appears that a state in principle has no obligation to recognize or ensure an autonomous regime within its territory. There has so far been no international agreement that provides for such obligation or recognizes the right of autonomy to a minority group. Therefore, it cannot be defended that autonomy is a principle of international law. However, although it is not binding, many international and regional documents have emphasized the importance of autonomy, and in the preparation phase of the signed treaties, it is proposed that autonomy should be added to the treaty. There are also different practices in relation to the status of autonomous structures in international relations and before the judicial bodies. Some autonomous structures can operate independently of the state to which they are affiliated. In terms of being a applicant or prosecutor before the international judicial authorities, although there is no general provision, the case-related discrepancy has made a difference in the case.