Özet:

The questions in the minval about what justice is, how to get to the distinction between fair and unfair, whether it is possible to build a fair society are at the agenda of ethical and political theories, and at the heart of the liberal theories of justice. In this study, we aimed to re-establish the issue of justice, which is undefined, but a concept that has many opinions on its nature and is discussed, in the perspective of John Rawls and Robert Nozick, which stands at the forefront of the liberal justice theories. This article will include the theories of nobleness of both thinkers who express their opinion within the framework of the liberal justice theory. Thus, the two phiozophons will be assessed in terms of their statements about justice, differences and similarities, and will be determined whether they have any functional contribution to our understanding of justice. For this purpose, it will be questioned whether Rawls' Greek Nozick's theories of justice contributed to our search for understanding and understanding of justice. Our study will briefly refer to Rawls’ opinion of justice as justice; Nozick’s theory of justice, which deals with the individual’s freedom and rights in the forefront, and will frame the article by offering a kind of comparison of the opinions of justice of both thinkers.

Anahtar Kelimeler: