Özet:

The Jeans have been on the agenda of people with different names, such as albasty, peri, karabasan, since ancient times of history. The fact that the Jeans are concerned with people seems to continue in the same way today. Some people accept the existence of the Jeans, while some claim that there is no separate kind of being called the Jeans. There are also those who say that they have communicated with the Jeans and that they are influenced by the Jeans and that they are involved in different events. People who are subject to these claims are seen as psychiatric patients in some circles, while some people are also seen as individuals who have communicated with the Jeans. In this regard, it can be understood by the diversity of reactions that people have different perceptions about the Jeans. The point that we are wondering here is how people have an perception of the Jeans. Thus, this research has been aimed at developing a scale aimed at removing this curiosity and identifying how people have an perception of the Jeans. The research on the validity and reliability of the scale of the ginseng perception that is sought to be developed was carried out by the application of the online scale form created in Google forms on 605 students studying at the Faculty of Islamic Sciences of the University of Giresun and the Faculty of Education. The Qur’an was revealed in the Qur’an before the Qur’an was revealed in the Qur’an. Research has been conducted to determine what kind of ideas people have about the Jeans. As a result of this work, a 45-massive swimming pool was created. The materials in the scale pool are shown to the academics of religious education, religious sociology, interpretation science. 15 articles that could not directly contribute to the subject or be disturbed from the scale pool as a result of the construction talks with academics were removed. The remaining 30 items in the scale pool were applied to students by translation method. After the scale was applied to students, the suitability of the data set for the factor analysis was considered. For this purpose, the data set obtained by the application of the scale has been examined by the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin ratio and the Barlett test results. The approximation of the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin ratio to 1 indicates the suitability of the sample applied by the scale. If the KMO ratio is below 0.5 it means that the sample is not suitable. The Barlett test shows the suitability of the corelion matrix for the analysis of the factor. The barlett test value is less than 0.05 indicates the relevance of the intervariable relationship to the factor analysis.2 KMO sample adequacy statistics indicate that the intersubstancial connections are suitable for the factor analysis at a high level (KMO = 0.831) in terms of statistics. The Barlett Globality test result also (Sig.=0,000) showed that there was a sufficient level of relationship between the substances to do the analysis of the factor. The structure validity of the measurement has been tested by the explanatory factor analysis. In the factor analysis, eight items were scaled due to the fact that the factor load was below the appropriate values. The remaining 22 items were submitted to factor analysis again, but the factor reversion process was carried out because the factors were not completely clear. In the process of reversing the factor, it has been shown that the matters of the scale are gathered under three factors and that the values of which the factors are obtained are at the level of meaning. The three-factor model presented in the explanatory factor analysis was tried to identify the validity of the model presented under the verifying factor analysis in the amos 23 program. In this context, the quarter value in the analysis results "X2 = 261,40" is acceptable between 2 and 3, the value "X2 /df = 3,529" is acceptable below 5, the average quarter of errors (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation-RMSEA) is acceptable with the value "0,65", the standardized conformity index (Normed Fit Index - NFI)" is acceptable with the value "0,915", the non-standardized conformity index (Non-Normed Fit Index - NNFI)" is acceptable with the value "0,92", the comparative conformity index (Comparative Fit Index-CFI) is acceptable with the value "0,93", the standardized conformity index (Normed Fit Index - NFI)" is acceptable with the value "0,915" 89, root Mean Square Residual-RMR (Root Mean Square Residual-RMR) is 0.72, standard root Mean Residual-SRMR (Standardized Root Mean Residual-SRMR) = 0.05 is acceptable, Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) is acceptable with 0.94, the adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) is good to 0.91. With the verifying factor analysis, the mediated factor values were matched with acceptable values. The scale, which is 22 matters, has become a scale of 14 matters with the extract of matters that are not in appropriate values of regression values as a result of the verifying factor analysis.

Anahtar Kelimeler: