User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 1
 Views 41
 Downloands 8
Fahreddin Râzî’nin Sofistleri Eleştirisi: Kelâm Özelinde Bir İnceleme
2020
Journal:  
Milel ve Nihal
Author:  
Abstract:

Antik Yunan’ın siyasal ve sosyal şartları sonucunda tarih sahnesine çıkan sofistler, bir kavram olarak çeviri hareketleri ile beraber Aristoteles üzerinden İslam düşüncesi kaynaklarına girmiştir. Kelâmcılar, eserlerinin bilgi bahislerinde sofistlere geniş ölçüde yer vermiş ve sadece görüşlerini veya ortaya attıkları problemleri aktarmakla yetinmemişlerdir. Sofistleri, Lâedriyye, İnâdiyye ve İndiyye şeklinde yeni bir tasnife tabi tutan kelâmcılar, Aristoteles perspektifinden hareketle çeşitli açılımlarda bulunmakla birlikte, çelişmezlik ve üçüncü halin imkânsızlığı gibi ilkeler bağlamında çözüm üretmişlerdir. Kelâm ve felsefe uğrağında önemli bir yerde duran Fahreddin Râzî ise, kendinden önceki mirası devralarak sofistleri farklı bağlamlarda tekrar gündeme getirmiştir. Râzî’nin sofistleri ele aldığı yeni bağlam, İslam düşünce geleneğinde mezhepler arasında çıkan tartışmalar dolayımındadır. Bu çalışma, Râzî ve kelâm ilminin sofistik görüşleri işleyiş tarzlarını ve çözümlerini bağlamsal bir çerçeve kapsamında incelemektedir

Keywords:

Fahreddin Râzî’s Sophist Criticism: A Review in the Speech
2020
Journal:  
Milel ve Nihal
Author:  
Abstract:

As a result of the political and social conditions of ancient Greece, the sophisticists who came to the stage of history, along with their translation movements as a concept, entered the sources of Islamic thought through Aristotle. The vocabulary has placed a large place to the sophistic in their works’ information betting, and they are not sufficient to simply transmit their opinions or the problems they present. The philosophers, who undertake a new tasnife in the form of Lâdriyya, Indyya and Indyya, have found different openings from the perspective of Aristotle, but have created solutions in the context of principles such as contradiction and the impossibility of the third state. Thus, when the philosophy and the philosophy of the philosophy and the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy of the philosophy. The new context in which the sofistics of Razi are addressed is due to the disputes that arise between the religions in the Islamic thought tradition. This study examines the sophisticated views of the Razi and Kelam knowledge of the methods of operation and solutions within a contextual framework.

Keywords:

Fakhr Ad-din Ar-razi’s Criticism Of The Sophists: An Analyse In The Context Of The Kalam
2020
Journal:  
Milel ve Nihal
Author:  
Abstract:

The sophists on the stage of history as a result of Ancient Greek’s political and social conditions have entered the Islamic thought sources through Aristotle with translation movements as a concept. Kalam scholars, have given place to the sophists at the knowledge of their works and haven’t only contented with putting forward their views or the problems they propounded. Kalam scholars put the sophists through Laedriyye, Inadiyye, and Indiyye through a new classification in addition to several expansions by the perspective of Aristotle that have found a way depending on the principle of noncontradiction and the impossibility of the third state. Also, Fakhr ad-Din ar-Razi stood in a prominent place where kalam and philosophy, made sophists a current issue again in different contexts by taking over the inheritance from the predecessor. The new context that Razi brought up sophists, is among the controversy of sects in the tradition of Islamic thought. This study examines the approaches of Razi and kalam philosophy on handling sophisticated visions and solutions within a contextual framework

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Milel ve Nihal

Field :   İlahiyat; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Ulusal

Metrics
Article : 530
Cite : 1.564
Milel ve Nihal