Özet:

The first attempt to build a law-knowledge under the name of Fukıh usûlü/metodology was carried out by Muslims and from the early periods the works in this field were written. As all the Islamic states, the Ottoman states have also contributed to this. They have made a lot of work in the fields of fighters, worshippers, worshippers, worshippers, and worshippers. Molla Hüsrev and Fudayl Çelebi are among the Ottoman allies who write in this field. Molla has lost. 885/1480), Fatih Sultan Mehmed was one of the people who made shaykhulism during the period and made significant contributions to the establishment and functioning of the scientist organization. The scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes of the scenes. It is also the Fudayl Çelebi, which we will evaluate in the work of Fudayl. 991/1583) is the father of Zenbilli Ali Cemâlî Efendi. By educating many students, including 932/1526, it has been influential in the development of the Ottoman science world. Fudayl Çelebi, who lived about a century after Molla Hüsrev, is an Ottoman allies who grew up in the Ottoman medreses, who have been a woman for many years and who have been a woman in important centres such as Baghdad, Halep and Mekka. As a natural result of having spent his educational life in the Ottoman medreses and of making moederism, he read and read the works of Molla Hüsrev. He also made a significant contribution to the field of Islamic law with his works about the fights and fights as Molla Hüsrev. Fudayl Çelebi's works named Adâbü'l-evsiyaâ and ed-Damânât took place among the sources of Mecelle, which is an important turning point in terms of law history. Fudayl Çelebi has been very influenced by Molla Hüsrev in his work of fiction that will be dealt with in the work. This effect appears clearly throughout the work. He used the concept that Molla Hüsrev used to name his work and the charity he wrote to this work. However, when he writes his work, the place is opposed to Molla Hüsrev and criticizes him. He criticized Molla Hüsrev sometimes by not understanding his predecessor; he criticized him by having left their way without reason, and sometimes he pointed out that the information he gave is missing and insufficient. But despite the aspects he criticized, it is clear that Fudayl Çelebi strives to make Molla Hüsrev's work more perfect. He had taken this work in advance, he tried to re-specify and make his definitions more suitable for education and teaching, taking care of the sleep between them. In this study, Fudayl Çelebi will try to figure out what issues Molla Hüsrev has criticized, what are the aspects he thinks differently and for what purpose he has made his work. The topics that Fudayl Çelebi thinks different from Molla Hüsrev will be processed in three titles: Preferences, Type and Design of the Book and Definitions. The words of the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, the Holy Qur’an, and the Holy Qur’an.