Özet:

For the first time, the expression "God of the gaps", was used by the Evenjalist researcher Henry Drummond (1851-1897). And it was frequently used and discussed in the arguments of different God imagination. Drummond defended with this expression that there was a area where the human mind could not be defined in nature, but that God knows it and can be filled by Him again. In other words, it was assumed that ontological or epistemological unknowns could be known and filled by God. With the meaning that was attribute to the concept that the people couldn’t explain academically and because of that they said “Refer to God and He will know only.” But with the time some of the points of the science with the result of description and discovery is filled now with science what was "Filled with God" in the first step. From this point atheist they said: "One day science will explain everything and after that there will be no faults. So as no more gaps will be controlled by God but will be by science.” In the past, how the nature events consisted was unknown like how the rain occurs, how a earthquake occurs and how the night and day occurs. These kinds of events explained directly with God. But nowadays these and other nature events can be explained in expression of their causes and results. Accordingly, what is alleged about "there is no need for God" has been expressed in words. This theistic theology, which was placed on the basis of gap in nature as a field of God's discovery, it has gradually replaced to Deism with scientific explanations. German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer (D.1945), he stand out from this concept that it will lead to epistemological deviations about God and he emphasized that God should be sought in the essentially of life, not out of life. Bonhoeffer justified with this forecast. With this, (On this way) of the mechanical universe that is related of God's thoughts this detection style became later in to "deistic natural theology" and is being expressed like this. On the ground of the theological context of nature is God be portrayed as "God of the gaps". In one sense, when it is mentioned about Almighty God who created the universe, and on the other side who cannot respond to him and it seems that there is a passive perception of God who is uncared about the people and unconscious about what they are doing. If the Theist are trying to some of unknowingly presence things about the existence of a God with the expression of "God of the gap" it could be criticized. Because, if it will be understood like this it comes out to a situation that human own ignorance is presenting as a evidence for the existence of God which is unacceptable. In addition, this idea will break the will of scientific research and it will even be possible that it prevents the progress in this field. But in our work we didn’t see from the Theist of the expression “God of the gaps” as an argument for the proof of God. Believers with other words they do not say that "Who didn't understand this situation so there is a God." On the contrary, we have found in the argument of the atheists what was used as an antithesis for the thoughts of solid determinism of the gods who accepted the existence of a God but said that he did not interfere with life. Finally, we think that this expression used in the field of theistic thoughts is mixed with the field what is used in the atheist and deist thoughts. Those who say, as science progresses the gap will be filled in and there will be no need for God. It comes in front of us that their important dilemma is that they are putting the faith out of knowledge. While the most important way to know God is the existence of the outside world and information about him. Therefore, contrary to the claim that there will be no need for faith as the knowledge increases. It will be more realistic to say that as knowledge increases it will directly confirm the faith and enquiry it. On the other hand when viewed from the Kalamic perspective, the principle of the truth of the objects and the knowledge bet is taken together and it aspirates to knowledge in the mind of the human and to the outside reality with availability to arrive for ma'rifatullah. Hereby, the object’s existence is absolutely accepted in the Kalam and is making with it analogous of metaphysical dimension. This is not from the gap but it seems that it is being moved from the existence. If there is going to be searched for a proof of God’s existence it has to be from the Kalam’s first application of the inference of the fullness and not from the gap. God is not only the "God of the gap" but he is also the "God of the gap and the fullness, the creator and the creates of all." We testify to know about the existing/creating of God’s existence, the absolute will and the might and not about the gap that we don’t know. Today the expression "God of the gaps" it's not being accepted by theists. But contrary they try to understand/make sense about the universe and the contents. Eventually, in the Islamic faith, for the universe and for the existence of God who rule the human, is "at any moment in a work" or "doing as he wants" not inappropriate for the expression "God of the gaps" that has been attributed for the meaning by the atheism and deism. On the last analysis about the expression "God of the gaps" the word "God" doesn't seem like the God of the religion. The belief of God for the non-intervention of life it's not in the real meaning that there is a belief for God. Because it is not enough to know and to prove God’s existence outside of the universe. He/It must bring the God he believes in, in his own universe.

Anahtar Kelimeler: