User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 9
 Views 15
 Downloands 14
Okul Yoneticilerinin 19. Milli Egitim Surasi Kararlari ve 29026 Sayili Yonetmelik Cercevesinde Okul Yoneticilerinin Atanmasi ve Degerlendirilmesine İliskin Gorusleri
2020
Journal:  
Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty
Author:  
Abstract:

In this study it was aimed to determine opinions and suggestions of school principals on decisions taken at 19. National Education Council and legislation no.29026 about appointment and evaluation of school principals. The study was designed by using case study method, one of the qualitative study methods. The participants of study consisted of 11 school principals and vice principals. Data, collected with semi-structured interviews, were analyzed with content-analysis method. Results of the study showed that the participant school principals criticize legislation no.29026 by indicating that does not include an objective appointment system and clear evaluation criteria. On the other hand, principals evaluated the decisions taken at 19. National Education Council positively because these decisions emphasize merit and process evaluation but they stated that evaluation criteria should be clearer and more objective.

Keywords:

School Officers 19. National Education Decisions and Opinions On The Appointment and Evaluation Of School Managers Within The Framework Of Regulation No. 29026
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

In this study it was aimed to determine opinions and suggestions of school principles on decisions taken at 19. National Education Council and legislation no.29026 on appointment and evaluation of school principles. The study was designed using case study method, one of the qualitative study methods. The participants of the study consisted of 11 school principles and vice principles. Data, collected with semi-structured interviews, were analyzed with content-analysis method. Results of the study showed that the participant school principals criticize legislation no.29026 by indicating that does not include an objective appointment system and clear evaluation criteria. On the other hand, the principles evaluated the decisions taken at 19. The National Education Council positively because these decisions emphasize merit and process evaluation but they stated that the evaluation criteria should be clearer and more objective.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 239
Cite : 529
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Citation Index