Abstract:

With unreasonable wealth, unreasonable business sighting and unfair facts, unreasonable debt is one of the two rounds. The most important difference from other non-profit debt relationships is that we do not need the will element when wealth occurs. Unreasonable wealth is an independent debt relationship arising from the law. But this is a matter of the original nature of the debt creation or not. Some believe that a relationship of unreasonable wealth always carries a characteristic. It should also be discussed whether the request for reimbursement that arises from unreasonable wealth can be directed depending on the condition that wealth can be achieved. In the Turkish law, both points of view are defended. The most important international development on the law to be applied to unreasonable wealth is the Rome II Charter. The Rome II Rule. Article 10 has established the rules of bonding relating to the law applicable to international qualified uncertainty wealth. According to this, the law will be applied to the legal relationship in which it is left in the case for unreasonable wealth. The literature is linked to the original relationship. If the law is not established, if the parties have a common property at the time of rejuvenation, the law will be applied. If the law does not apply, the place where the wealth occurs will be applied. However, if the law is closely linked to unreasonable wealth, that law will be applied to the case. As you can see, it is a line-up line. A similar procedure was made by the Law No. 39. The only difference is that there is no place in the law of Mykuk and Mykuk. In our work, these connectivity rules will be examined in detail and compared with similar institutions.

Keywords: