Abstract:

One of the conditions for a town to be settled in the Ottoman era is the “trade houses”. Trade structures in cities, such as markets, houses, squares and beds, bring economic vitality and contribute positively to the development of the city. There was no way to go, because there was no way to go, because there was no way to go, because there was no way to go. Despite this negativity, it had trade structures that could meet the needs of the city and the surrounding people. It is necessary to be aware of the existence of the city’s own and surrounding trade facility from the 16th century, if necessary from the trips to the city in the 19th century. In the last 1903 chapter, there are five households. Unfortunately, only three of these stores, which are our subject, have been destroyed to the present day. In our work, the architectural characteristics of the three structures built both in the city-in-house, one as a warehouse building, were detailed. In the publications, the examples of the late Ottoman period were compared with the similarities and differences and the places between these works were revealed. After all, the two houses that are our subject have been determined to be one-house, three-storey and revaked plan schemes, garden, floor and space arrangements and the practices seen in the city-in-house houses since the 15th century, as a continuation, are preferred schemes even in the late period. The building is located on the front, 19th. Some details seen on the fronts of the public structures of the century indicate that even in a small structure on the roof, it has found an area of application. The main objective of our work is to emphasize the importance of restoring and preserving these works in the context of being structures that keep light on the socio-economic state of the city.

Keywords: