User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 66
 Views 106
 Downloands 47
Sınıf Öğretmeni Adaylarının Fen Öğretiminde Öğretmen Öz Yeterlik İnanç Düzeyleri ile Zeka Türleri Arasındaki İlişkinin Değerlendirilmesi
2007
Journal:  
Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

The main purpose of this research is to evaluate the relationship between primary school teacher candidates’ teacher self efficacy belief levels in science teaching and their intelligence types This research was prepared by survey model The sample of this research consists of 363 teacher candidates attending first second third and fourth grades of Gazi University Faculty of Education Department of Primary Education and Cukurova University Faculty of Education Department of Primary Education To collect data The Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Inventory STEBI Enochs Riggs 1990 and Scale of Multiple Intelligence Saban 2001 were used To analyze data independent samples t test one way ANOVA LSD analysis descriptive analysis and Pearson correlation coefficient were chosen Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated in order to establish reliabilities of the instruments SPSS 11 5 package programme was used during these analyses At the end of the study findings revealed that teacher candidates’ self efficacy belief level is average Meaningful differences weren’t determined between the candidates’ self efficacy beliefs according to their genders and grades of classroom in both general of the scale and subscales There is no meaningful correlation between the genders of the candidates and their intelligence types There are “strongly developed” level candidates in all types of intelligences Among the intelligence areas logical mathematical intelligence includes the most of the “strongly developed” level candidates It is determined that there are low and average level meaningful correlations between the candidates’ self efficacy scores and intelligence scores and between all of the intelligence scores In respect of ANOVA findings there are meaningful differences between candidates’ self efficacy scores according to different development levels of types of intelligence At the end of the study some proposals were put forward toward the educational practices and other related researches Key words: Self efficacy belief multiple intelligence science teaching

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles




Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi