Abstract:

Parliamentarism, presidential and semi-presidential systems are all the democratic systems. The powers in U.K., the British representative regime is the cradle of parliamentary government, there are equality and balance as theorically but the executive body is above all them in practice. The Council of Ministers in Parliamentarism has been criticized in practice that taking its monopoly not only the executive but also legislative authority U.S. presidential system, contributes to the stability of the government and politics. Consisted of a cumbersome bureaucracy from the center of everything in Turkey been solved, rather than centralized, decentralized management should be based on. There is a two-party system in the United States, the President is a two-round system selected. The judiciary, the legislature and the executive is strong enough. Legislative power is completely independent of the executive to submit to Parliament the draft law does not exist. The Congress serves as the legislative and audit, and ministers (secretaries) outside the Assembly appointed by the president. Turkish Prime Minister, according to the President of the United States, 2 or 3 times more powerful. The implementation of the budget in the U.S. Congress, the Government is authorized to Turkey. Implementation of the budget in the United States Congress, the Government is authorized to Turkey.Semi-presidential system features are applicable in France. Public chooses the President, as well as the management of parliamentary government under two headings, the President and the Prime Minister. In France, there are two chambers, 491-seat Senate and 315-member National Assembly.As explained in this paper, a semi-presidential system, instead of standing in close proximity to the country been made in adaptation, addressed aspects of the clunky, Turkey will be appropriate for the benefit of a presidential system in Turkey

Keywords: