Abstract:

These forms are characterized by polysemy and multifunctionality that was inherent in them since ancient times. Besides the use for the main function (as a definition (adjective) of noun denoting action attributed to a particular person or object as its feature) many participle forms in the Tatar dialect language serve as a predicate. However, they differ in various degrees of intensity and different opportunities of functional use, as well as the peculiarities of territorial distribution. These forms are distinguished by unlimited possibilities of word formation: they are characterized by the formation of participles from both simple and complex bases. The abovementioned forms, in contrast to the aforementioned core elements of diasystem, are localized only in some individual dialects and subdialects. They are characterized by limited word formation and narrow functional use. The forms with -ğılık, -gĭlĭk; -ğısız, -gĭsĭz; -akay, -ekey, etc. are not core elements of diasystem, however they are elements of particular systems. The forms with ırlık, -ĭrlĭk; -ırday, -ĭrdey; uçan, -üçen; -ğısız, -gĭsĭz are used in all sub-dialects of the Middle dialect, and forms with -atıgan, -ğılık are represented in all dialects and sub-dialects of Siberian Tatars. At the same time, forms remaining outside of the core part diasystem can serve as classification features of particular dialect systems.

Keywords: