Abstract:

The aim of this study is to study the impact of psychological consulting on adolescent values and motivational action conflicts with the Cognitive Behavioral Approach-oriented Group. The study was conducted with 24 students unreflectively selected among the students in a MEB-related high school. Values Guidelines and Motivational Action Conflict Scale's middle scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale scale While the experimental group was applied a psychological consultation program with 10 sessions, no application was made to the control group. In the study, 2x3 split plot pattern was used. The Scale of Value Guidelines and the Scale of Motivational Action Conflict are applied to students in the experiment and control group three times in different times. In the analysis of the data obtained as a result of measurements, whether there is a significant difference between measurements and groups, it is determined by the two-factor variance analysis technique for repeated measurements on one factor. In the analysis of data, the SPSS 15 package program is used. The study found that the practice of cognitive behavioral approach-based group-based psychological counseling has no effect on the youth’s success and well-being values and motivational action conflict decision-making and learning/learning study, and has no effect on the motivational action conflict during their free time. In the control group, there was no change in the levels of values and motivational action conflicts.

Keywords: