User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 15
 Views 65
 Downloands 27
Waspas ve Codas Yöntemleri ile Oecd Ülkelerinin Sağlık Göstergeleri Açısından Kıyaslamalı Analizi
2020
Journal:  
Journal of Selçuk University Social Sciences Vocational School
Author:  
Abstract:

Bedenen ve ruhen iyi durumda olan sağlıklı bireylerden oluşan toplumlar, refah ve gelişmişlik düzeyleri açısından iyi bir konuma sahiptir. Bu nedenle sağlık alanında yapılacak olan her türlü iyileşme ve gelişme ilk olarak bireyleri ve daha sonra toplumları iyi yönde etkileyecektir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, OECD'ye üye olan 36 ülkenin belirlenen sağlık gösterge kriterleri altında değerlendirilerek sıralamalarının elde edilmesidir. Değerlendirmede kullanılan kriterlerin ağırlıklarını belirlemek için SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) yöntemi kullanılmış daha sonra literatürde yeni geliştirilen Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) yöntemlerinden WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) ve CODAS (Combinative Distance-Based Assessment) kullanılarak ülkelerin sıralama sonucunda nerede yer aldıkları belirlenmiştir. Kullanılan yöntemler sonucu elde edilen sıralamalar arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemek için Spearman korelasyon katsayısından yararlanılmıştır.

Keywords:

Comparative Analysis Of Waspas and Codas Methods and Oecd Countries’ Health Indicators
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

Societies of healthy individuals who are in good physical and mental condition have a good position in terms of their levels of well-being and development. Therefore, any kind of healing and development in the field of health will first affect individuals and then communities in a good direction. The aim of this study is to obtain rankings by assessing the 36 OECD member countries under defined health indicator criteria. The SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) method was used to determine the weights of the criteria used in the evaluation, and the newly developed multi-criterial decision-making methods, WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment) and CODAS (Combinative Distance-Based Assessment) were used to determine where the countries were ranked. The Spearman correlation ratio has been used to determine the relationship between the rankings achieved as a result of the methods used.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Journal of Selçuk University Social Sciences Vocational School

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 463
Cite : 2.269
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Citation Index