User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 9
 Views 223
 Downloands 98
Cok Kri̇terli̇ Karar Verme Yontemleri̇yle Ogrenci̇ İsleri̇ Otomasyon Seci̇mi̇
2019
Journal:  
Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Öğrenci işleri otomasyonu (ÖİO); öğrenci, akademisyen ve idari personel üçlüsünün koordinasyonunu sağlama görevini üstlenen ve her seviyedeki öğrencilerin üniversiteye ilk kayıttan mezun oluncaya ve mezuniyetinden sonraki süreçlerde de tüm işlemlerini yürütülebildiği yazılımlardır. ÖİO'ler, kullanıcıların performanslarını büyük ölçüde etkileyen yazılım sistemleridir. Kullanıcıların performansını artırabilmek için ÖİO'lerin etkin ve yüksek verimlilikte çalışması gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı farklı üniversitelerde kullanılan ÖİO'lerin performanslarını ölçerek en uygun olanı belirleyebilmektir. Bu süreçte bir birlerini etkileyen bir çok kriter dikkate alındığından sorun; Çok Kriterli Karar Verme (ÇKKV) problemi olarak görülmektedir. Beş üniversitenin kullanmakta oldukları ÖİO'ler, ÇKKV yöntemlerinden SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis ), ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) ve  EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) yöntemleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. SWARA, ölçme kriterlerini ağırlıklandırmada; ARAS ve EDAS  yöntemleri ise ÖİO'lerin performansını belirlemede kullanılmıştır. Çalışma neticesinde en önemli kriterin veritabanı güvenliği olduğu belirlenmiştir. ÖİO'lerin sıralanmasında her bir değerlendirme yöntemi  aynı sonucu vermiştir.

Keywords:

Cok Kri̇terli̇ Karar Verme Yontemleri̇yle Ogrenci̇ İsleri̇ Otomasyon Seci̇mi̇
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

Student Affairs Automation (SAA) system is the software coordinating the trio of students, academics, and administrative staff. These programs are used to carry out all the procedures of each student from the enrollment to the university to the graduation. SAAs are software systems that greatly affect users' performance. SAAs must work effectively and efficiently so that the users’ performance can increase. The aim of this study is to determine the most appropriate SAA by measuring the performance of SAAs used in different universities. The problem is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making one as many criteria affecting each other are considered. The SAAs used by the five universities were evaluated by using SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis), ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) and EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) methods. SWARA was used for weighting the measurement criteria while ARAS and EDAS methods were used to determine the performance of the SAAs. The study proved that the most important criterion was database security. Each evaluation method gave the same result in the ranking of the SAAs.

Selection Of Student Automation System By Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

Student Affairs Automation (SAA) system is the software coordinating the trio of students, academicians, and administrative staff. These programs are used to carry out all the procedures of each student from the enrollment to the university to the graduation. SAAs are software systems that greatly affect users' performances. SAAs must work effectively and efficiently so that the users' performance can increase. The aim of this study is to determine the most appropriate SAA by measuring the performances of SAAs used in different universities. The problem is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making one as many criteria affecting each other are considered. The SAAs used by the five universities were evaluated by using SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis), ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) and EDAS (Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution) methods. SWARA was used for weighting the measurement criteria while ARAS and EDAS methods were used to determine the performances of the SAAs. The study proved that the most important criterion was database security. Each evaluation method gave the same result in the ranking of the SAAs.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles










Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 422
Cite : 4.332
2023 Impact : 0.368
Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi