Abstract:

This paper aims to explore the effects of leadership types on personal motivation in the banking sector. The methodology used is survey-based. In this study, the group who fills the survey is consisted of bank employees in Birmingham. The group was selected randomly. In this study, Herzberg's two factors of Motive and Hygiene applied seperately. Firstly, the effects of leadership styles on motivation factors were tested. Then the effects of leadership styles on hygiene factors were tested. Correlation analysis was done. After analysis, the correlation between informational leadership and motivation was seen. There is no correlation between democratic, autocratic, laissez faire leadership style and motivation was seen. In this study, the leaders who manage the bank use democratic and informational leadership style was observed. It was also observed that there is no difference between private and public banks with regard to motivation.motivation in the banking sector. The methodology used is survey-based. In this study, the group who fills the survey is consisted of bank employees in Birmingham. The group was selected randomly. In this study, Herzberg's two factors of Motive and Hygiene applied seperately. Firstly, the effects of leadership styles on motivation factors were tested. Then the effects of leadership styles on hygiene factors were tested. Correlation analysis was done. After analysis, the correlation between informational leadership and motivation was seen. There is no correlation between democratic, autocratic, laissez faire leadership style and motivation was seen. In this study, the leaders who manage the bank use democratic and informational leadership style was observed. It was also observed that there is no difference between private and public banks with regard to motivation.

Keywords: