User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 7
 Views 130
 Downloands 76
Turkceyi İkinci Dil Olarak Ogrenenlerin Okudugunu Anlama Yeterliklerinin Es Degerligi
2019
Journal:  
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
Author:  
Abstract:

Nowadays, teaching Turkish as a second and foreign language is being practiced within official or private organizations in Turkey and abroad through Turkish teaching set which are prepared for this process. Individuals, who learn Turkish with different language teaching sets and under different organizations, are being given a certificate of C1 according to the exam results which is conducted after 920 hours of instruction. However, the absence of implementation unity among organizations, preparation of the certificate exams by the institutions themselves and conducting of Turkish Teaching process with different language teaching sets in each institution suggest that Turkish learners may have different language levels at the end of the teaching process. From this point of view, the aim of this study is to determine the reading proficiency levels of learners, who have learned Turkish in different language centers and with different language teaching sets, to compare equivalence of these levels and to reveal whether reading proficiency levels in Turkish are affected by some other variables. The sample of the study consists of 120 foreign students who have completed C1 level in 8 different institutions and with 4 different Turkish teaching sets. The Turkish Proficiency Exam (TPE) which is a standard measurement tool of Turkish with international validity was used for data collection. When whole points obtained from reading comprehension test of 120 foreign students who attended to the research and completed C1 level are evaluated all together, it was found out that learners are at B2 level averagely in terms of reading comprehension levels. When the maximum and minimum scores of the learners are examined, it was seen that among these foreign students in the sample, there are those at the level of C2 as well as learners at the level of B1. Having a wide range of reading comprehension levels of learners who received C1 certificate after completing 920 hours of language education that C1 level requires and being below C1 level of nearly half of the learners in the sample in terms of reading comprehension levels indicate that there are important problems on qualification, achievement, seriousness and equivalency of language teaching.

Keywords:

Knowledge Of The Ability To Learn Turkish As A Second Language
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

Today, teaching Turkish as a second and foreign language is being practiced within official or private organizations in Turkey and abroad through Turkish teaching set which are prepared for this process. Individuals, who learn Turkish with different language teaching sets and under different organizations, are being given a certificate of C1 according to the exam results which is conducted after 920 hours of instruction. However, the absence of implementation unity among organizations, preparation of the certificate exams by the institutions themselves and conducting of Turkish Teaching process with different language teaching sets in each institution suggest that Turkish learners may have different language levels at the end of the teaching process. From this point of view, the aim of this study is to determine the reading proficiency levels of learners, who have learned Turkish in different language centers and with different language teaching sets, to compare equivalence of these levels and to reveal whether reading proficiency levels in Turkish are affected by some other variables. The sample of the study consists of 120 foreign students who have completed C1 level in 8 different institutions and with 4 different Turkish teaching sets. The Turkish Proficiency Exam (TPE) which is a standard measurement tool of Turkish with international validity was used for data collection. When whole points obtained from reading understanding test of 120 foreign students who attended to the research and completed C1 level are evaluated all together, it was found that learners are at B2 level average in terms of reading understanding levels. When the maximum and minimum scores of the learners are examined, it was seen that among these foreign students in the sample, there are those at the level of C2 as well as learners at the level of B1. Having a wide range of reading understanding levels of learners who received C1 certificate after completing 920 hours of language education that C1 level requires and being below C1 level of half of the learners in the sample in terms of reading understanding levels indicate that there are important problems on qualification, achievement, seriousness and equivalency of language teaching.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 679
Cite : 4.657
2023 Impact : 0.517
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi