User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 62
 Downloands 17
THE COMPARISON OF ONE-STEP MUSICAL TALENT TESTS AND TWO-STEP MUSICAL TALENT TESTS FROM THE POINT OF DIFFERENT VARIABLES
2020
Journal:  
International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches
Author:  
Abstract:

The music teaching departments of education faculty, fine arts education branches are the main professional music education institutions at present. These institutions meet the need for the music teachers of our country with their graduates. Music teaching programs of education faculties accept students through a special talent test. This study aims to compare one-step musical talent tests and two-step musical talent tests. This comparison is made from the point of two variables: gender and the graduated school. In adition, the last two years one-step musical talent tests are perused and compared among. The data of the study consists of the 400 candidates scores who became successfull at the musical talent tests of a university located in Blacksea Reagion, between 2012-2019. In this study general survey method is used. The data is analysed by using a statistical computer program which is widely used in social sciences. As a result, it’s seen that the average grades of two-step tests in two-voice hearing, rythym repetition, solfege and playing are higher than one-step tests. In-field candidates are more successfull except for 4-voice hearing, rythym repetition, and singing tests. And the success of the female candidates are higher in all other tests except for melody repetition, rythym repetition and playing. At the same time, in 2019 all the scores except for melody repetition are declined. The sharpest decline is seen in solfege. While the number of the out-field students in 2018 was 7, it became 28 in 2019. So it’s possible to say that the decline in phases which requires a musical education background is an expected result due to the decline in number of in-field students. In 2019, the students could manage to repeat 2 and a half rythym measure of 8 rythym measures that given in test. In four voice hearing, they could one of two chord questions.

Keywords:

THE COMPARISON OF ONE-STEP MUSICAL TALENT TESTS AND TWO-STEP MUSICAL TALENT TESTS FROM THE POINT OF DIFFERENT VARIABLES
2020
Author:  
Abstract:

The music teaching departments of education faculty, fine arts education branches are the main professional music education institutions at present. These institutions meet the need for the music teachers of our country with their graduates. Music teaching programs of education faculties accept students through a special talent test. This study aims to compare one-step musical talent tests and two-step musical talent tests. This comparison is made from the point of two variables: gender and the graduated school. In addition, the last two years one-step musical talent tests are perused and compared among. The data of the study consists of the 400 candidates scores who became successful at the musical talent tests of a university located in Blacksea Reagion, between 2012-2019. In this study, the general survey method is used. The data is analyzed by using a statistical computer program which is widely used in social sciences. As a result, it’s seen that the average degrees of two-step tests in two-voice hearing, rhythym repetition, solfege and playing are higher than one-step tests. In-field candidates are more successful except for 4-voice hearing, rhythm repetition, and singing tests. And the success of the female candidates are higher in all other tests except for melody repetition, rhythm repetition and playing. At the same time, in 2019 all the scores except for melody repetition are declined. The sharpest decline is seen in Solfege. While the number of the out-field students in 2018 was 7, it became 28 in 2019. So it's possible to say that the decline in phases that requires a musical education background is an expected result due to the decline in the number of in-field students. In 2019, the students could manage to repeat 2 and a half rhythm measure of 8 rhythm measures that given in the test. In four voice hearing, they could one of two chord questions.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles






International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 317
Cite : 99
International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches