User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 24
 Downloands 4
Legalitas Rekaman Circuit Closed Television (CCTV) Dalam Proses Pembuktian di Persidangan
2018
Journal:  
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana
Author:  
Abstract:

One part of the judicial process is verifying evidence for searching the material truth of case to assist judges in making decisions. One aid that can be used in verification the evidence during the trial is the Information Technology in the form of Circuit Closed Television (CCTV) footage because it is not regulated in the positive Law in Indonesia. Because of that, in this research are used a normative method to answer the problem with the approach of legislation and approach to the concept. The legal arrangement of CCTV footage as evidence in Act No. 8 of 1981 on the Law of Criminal Procedure Code is not exist, because the Criminal Procedure Code are setting a limited valid evidence under the Act, but for the interest of seeking the material truth, then there makes Act No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transaction which govern the other evidence in the form of Electronic Information and/or Electronic Records. The strength of evidence from CCTV footage has not been expressly provided in Act No. 11 of 2008 on ITE, so that the strength of evidence is still exempt, which means that the strength of evidence is still based on the judge’s conviction. Salah satu bagian dalam proses peradilan yakni adanya proses pembuktian guna mencari kebenaran materiil dari suatu perkara guna membantu hakim dalam mengambil keputusan. Salah satu bantuan yang dapat digunakan dalam pembuktian di persidangan adalah teknologi informasi yang berbentuk rekaman CCTV, tetapi dalam persidangan dipertanyakan akan kekuatan pembuktian dari rekaman CCTV tersebut, karena tidak diatur dalam hukum positif di Indonesia. Penelitian ini mempergunakan metode penelitian normatif untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konsep. Pengaturan rekaman CCTV sebagai alat bukti ini dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (selanjutnya disebut KUHAP) tidak ditemukan pengaturannya, karena KUHAP mengatur secara limitatif alat bukti yang sah menurut Undang-Undang. Demi kepentingan mencari kebenaran materiil maka dibentuklah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik yang mengatur tentang alat bukti lain berupa informasi elektronik dan/atau dokumen elektronik. Kekuatan pembuktian dari rekaman CCTV belum diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang ITE, sehingga pembuktiannya masih bersifat bebas, yang artinya kekuatan pembuktian dari alat bukti tersebut masih berdasarkan atas keyakinan hakim.

Keywords:

null
2018
Author:  
0
2018
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana

Field :   Hukuk

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 397
Cite : 28
2023 Impact : 0.016
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana