Abstract:

The translation of the summer has a number of difficulties for the translator in terms of the diversity of the culture-specific motives that the source text contains, and the possibility of finding responses that may be appropriate in the target text to the culture-specific motives. The translator sometimes translates items or special names that are specific to this culture as foreign to the male culture, and sometimes makes them appropriate to the male culture. But this decision can sometimes not only be in the hands of the translation, but also depend on the social background of the time the work was translated. Therefore, some works have been reversed over time for various reasons, such as social change, the expectations of people, the change of the literary point of view. When compared with the first translations, it is evident that the translators have differences in their decisions. The re-translation hypothesis suggests that re-translations are more source-cultural-focused than the first translations (Desmidt, 2009). But the species that are not counted in the center, like the child's letter, are left out of this hypothesis. In the summer translation, the source that the translator encounters leads the culture-specific subjects and sees it with a second eye as a translator. Therefore, the translation reflects the different translation strategies that the translation consciously or unconsciously applies to the objects in this source text. In this sense, this study will focus on two different translations of the work "Black Beauty" written by Anna Sewell and included in the framework of children's literature in Turkish. The responses in the target text to certain specific names in the book are studied within the framework of the "localization" and "externalization" strategies implemented by the translators.

Keywords: