Abstract:

It is an undeniable truth that the administrative understanding in our country, initially the public sector, is in a permanent innovative period. Naturally, this period that goes in parallel with the world results in that ruled people gradually having more determining and efficient position over rulers. This evolution in public administration understanding makes both sides of administration, namely rulers and ruled people, have different responsibilities. The rulers now have to adopt “transparency” and “accountability” concepts, and maintain their activities on that direction; however the ruled people are required to hold the participation and control mechanisms in a continuous operating position. It can be easily said that one of the main obstacle for carrying out these responsibilities in the proper sense is the administrative heritage of our country, taken from especially in the Ottoman Empire era and has a pretty passive structure against ruled people as a general quality, this heritage preserves its structure in the spite of the reforms that were tried to make real in the Tanzimat era and even it preserves its structure in the first years of the Republican Regime. It won’t be wrong to say that the efficiency struggle started between the administration sides in the multi-party period may once be seen contributing to the country’s administrative heritage for the benefit of ruled people, the main evolution period has started in the 21st century, and it is extended to modern days. It is regarded to be important to analyze generally the ruler and ruled relation in the sense of administrative reaction from the Ottoman State to the present terms of commenting on that aforesaid period more honesty.

Keywords: