Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 57
 İndirme 26
YÜKSEKÖĞRETİM YAŞAM KALİTESİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ VE PSİKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI / DEVELOPMENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY OF LIFE SCALE AND MEASURING ITS PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES
2017
Dergi:  
Asian Journal of Instruction (E-AJI)
Yazar:  
Özet:

The quality of life has been examined in social sciences, education, politics, economics and sociology. Each discipline defines the concept of quality of life from different perspectives. Quality of life is a relationship between the quality of the resources available and the individual satisfaction acquired from these sources. Educational services, administrative services and facilities are the most important determinants of quality of life in universities. Students need to have a sense of belonging to their universities in order to be successful in such settings. While research on school quality of life in Turkey is limited, most of the studies are focused on primary and secondary education schools. In this study, while the scale for the quality of life of university students was developed, variables related to the subject were determined by examining the literature in the relevant field. The main goal of this study is to examine the validity and reliability study of Higher Education Quality of Life Scale. The study was conducted on 381 university students from Bulent Ecevit University, Eregli Faculty of Education. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) showed that the scale included 4 factors as called "Technical Proficiency of the Instructor", "Behaviors of the Instructor", "Student Behaviors" and "Qualification of Administrative Staff ". The fit index values obtained from Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) indicated that the four-dimensional scale showed a fitted model. The factor loadings of the scale were ranged from .41 to .89. Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficients were.91 for "Technical Proficiency of the Instructor", .89 for "Behaviors of the Instructor", .87 for "Student Behaviors" and .89 for "Qualification of Administrative Staff ". In addition, test-retest reliability coefficients for these sub-factors in consecutive order were .90, .90, .84 and .85. In that case, 36,427% of the variances were explained by "Technical Proficiency of the Instructor" %10,773 by "Behaviors of the Instructor", %10,184 by "Student Behaviors" and, %8,709 by "Qualification of Administrative Staff ". Based on these findings, approximately 66.09% of the total variances were explained by the 4-factor scale. The study findings suggested that the scale may be considered as a valid and reliable instrument in the fields of education and psychology.        

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler






Asian Journal of Instruction (E-AJI)

Alan :   Eğitim Bilimleri

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 127
Atıf : 792
2023 Impact/Etki : 0.65
Asian Journal of Instruction (E-AJI)