Citation Number
3
Views
74
Downloands
37
Günümüz örgüt yapılarında yöneticilere büyük görevler düşmektedir. Zira yöneticiler örgütlerin amaçları doğrultusunda işlerine yönelik çeşitli tutumlara sahip olmaları gerekmektedir. Yöneticiler organizasyon içerisinde işlerine yönelik çeşitli karar verme tarzları sergilemektedirler. Ayrıca yöneticiler gerçekleştirdikleri faaliyetlerinde örgüt içerisinde karşılıklı ilişkiler geliştirdiği bireylere ve işletmeye/kuruma karşı çeşitli sorumluluklara sahiptirler. Yöneticilerin bu sorumluluklarına önemli etkileri olan modern ahilik davranışlarının da ölçülmesi gerekmektedir. Bu açıdan çalışmada yöneticilerin işlerine yönelik tutumları ile karar verme tarzları (stilleri) ve karar verme tarzları ile de modern ahilik (MA) davranışları arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Çalışma sonuçları yöneticilerin işlerine yönelik tutumları (IT) ile ani karar verme (AV), sezgisel karar verme (SV), rasyonel karar verme (RV) ve çekingen karar verme (CV) tarzları arasında pozitif ve anlamlı ilişkiler elde edilmişken bağımlı karar verme (BV) stili arasında negatif ve anlamlı ilişkilere ulaşılmıştır. Uygulamada yöneticilerin işlerine yönelik karar verme tarzları (KVT) ile iyi ahlaklı olmaları (IO), vicdanlı olmaları (VO), istikrarlı olmaları (SO) ve oportünist olmaları (OO) arasında pozitif ve anlamlı ilişkiler elde edilmişken makyavelist olmaları (MO) arasında negatif ve anlamlı ilişkiler olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
In today's organizational structures, managers have big duties. They show a variety of attitudes towards their work for the purposes of organizations. However, they may also have a variety of decision-making styles within their organization. Managers have various responsibilities to individuals and enterprises/institutions in which they have developed mutual relations within the organization. Their modern ahi responsibilities, which may have a significant impact on their responsibilities, need to be measured. In this regard, the relationship between the attitudes of managers about their work and their decision-making styles and decision-making styles and modern ahi behaviors are examined. In contrast to previous studies, it was tried to reveal the relationship between attitudes and decision-making styles by taking into consideration not only the historical conception of ahi past notions but also the meaning of today (modern ahi). While positive and meaningful relationships were found between the attitudes of managers about their work and their sudden attitudes towards decision making, intuitive decision making, rational decision making, and calculating decision-making styles, negative and meaningful relationships were reached with dependent decision-making style. In addition, there are positive and meaningful relationships between the decision-making styles of managers and their good morality, being conscious, stable and opportunistic, while there are negative and meaningful relationships between being make-up.
In today’s organizational structures, managers have big duties. They display a variety of attitudes towards their work for the purposes of organizations. However, they may also have a variety of decision-making styles within their organization. Managers have various responsibilities to individuals and enterprises/institutions in which they have developed mutual relations within the organization. Their modern ahi responsibilities, which may have a significant impact on their responsibilities, need to be measured. In this respect, the relationship between the attitudes of managers about their work and their decision-making styles (styles) and decision-making styles and modern ahi behaviours are examined. In contrast to previous studies, it was tried to reveal the relationship between attitudes and decision-making styles by taking into consideration not only the historical conception of ahi past notions but also the meaning of today (modern ahi). While positive and meaningful relationships were found between the attitudes of managers about their work and their sudden attitudes towards decision making, intuitive decision making, rational decision making, and hesitant decision-making styles, negative and meaningful relationships were reached with dependent decision-making style. In addition, there are positive and meaningful relationships between the decision-making styles of managers and their good morality, being conscientious, stable and opportunistic, while there are negative and meaningful relationships between being makyavelist.
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
