Görüntüleme
29
İndirme
5
Tasnif döneminin önemli eserlerinden biri Buhârî’nin (öl. 256/870) el-Câmiu’s-Sahîh’i diğeri de Dârimî’nin (öl. 255/869) daha çok Sünen ismiyle meşhur olmuş el-Müsned isimli eseridir. Buhârî’nin eseri sahihleri toplama amacıyla kaleme alınan ilk eser olmak, Dârimî’nin eseri ise bazı alimlerce İbn Mâce’nin (öl. 273/887) eseri yerine Kütüb-i Sitte’nin altıncı eseri olmaya layık görülmek bakımından büyük önemi haizdir. Bu iki temel eserin ilim bölümleri özellikle Ehl-i Hadis’in ilim anlayışını anlamlandırmak için kilit işlev görmektedir. Çünkü Buhârî’nin eserine hadis dünyası haklı olarak büyük kıymet vermiş, Dârimî ise İlim bölümünü literatürdeki en geniş İlim bölümü olarak şekillendirmiştir. İlim kavramının dinamikliği, farklı ilim dallarına göre farklılığı ve tarihi süreçteki değişimi bilinen bir durumdur. Ehl-i Hadis diğer ekollerden farklılaşan ilim anlayışlarını, rivayet kitapları içinde nakiller aracılığı ile ortaya koymuştur. Onların rivayetleri derledikleri eserlerde İlim konulu bölümler açması kendi bakış açılarıyla ilmin ne olduğunu rivayetler üzerinden sunma çabasının ürünüdür. Bu bölümler bir taraftan ilmin ne olduğunu ortaya koyarken diğer yandan ilmin ne olmadığını ifade etmekte, bu yönüyle dönemin ehl-i re’y’ine reddiye içeriği de sunabilmektedir. Çalışma, iki eserin ilgili bölümleri aracılığı ile aynı ekoldeki iki müellifin ilim anlayışlarının ortak ya da farklı yönlerini ortaya koymayı hedeflemektedir. İki bölümün hadislerinin sayısı, türleri, konu içerikleri ve bab başlıkları mukayese edilerek bir sonuca ulaşılacaktır. Makale iki müellifin ilim anlayışlarının temelde benzeşmekle beraber gerek konu seçimi gerekse kullandıkları rivayetler ve bab başlıkları itibariyle farklılaştıkları alanlar olduğunu da ortaya koymuştur.
One of the most important works of the period of Tasnif was the Bukhari (Death. [256:78] And he was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one who was the one. 255/869) is a work known as El-Müsned, which is more famous by the name Sunen. It is the first thing that has been made for the purposes of the Holy Spirit, and the first thing that has been made for the purposes of the Holy Spirit, and the first thing that has been made for the purposes of the Holy Spirit, and the first thing that has been made for the purposes of the Holy Spirit. 273/887) is of great importance in terms of being deserved to be the sixth work of the Library-i Sitte. The scientific sections of these two basic works have a key function to understand the knowledge of Ehl-i Hadis. For the work of Bukhari the Hadith world rightly gave great value, and Dârimî formed the Islamic part as the wider Islamic part in literature. The dynamicity of the concept of science is a known state of differences according to the different branches of science and change in the historical process. Ehl-i Hadis revealed the knowledge of the other ecoles, through the translations in the rivayet books. Their work is the result of their efforts to present what the knowledge is from their own sights to their own sights. These sections, on the one hand, reveal what the knowledge is, on the other hand, express what the knowledge is not, and in this direction it can also present the content of the refusal to the people of the time. The study aims to reveal the common or different aspects of the knowledge of the two subjects in the same section through the relevant sections of the two works. The number of events of the two sections, the types, the subject content and the chapter titles will be compared to a conclusion. The article revealed that the knowledge of the two scientists is basically similar, but it is also necessary to choose the subject, the rivayets they use and the chapters they differ according to the headlines.
One of the important works of the classification (tasneef) period is Bukhârî’s (d. 256/870) al-Jâmî’ al-Sahîh, and the other is Dârimî’s (d. 255/869) al-Musnad, which has become famous as Sunan. Bukhârî’s work is of great importance in terms of being the first work written for the purpose of collecting authentic hadiths, and Dârimî's work being deemed worthy of being the sixth work of Kutub al-Sittah, instead of Sunan Ibn Mâjah (d. 273/887) by some scholars. The book of knowledge (bab al-‘ilm) of these two basic works have an important function especially in making sense of the Ahl al-Hadith’s understanding of knowledge. Because Hadith scholars rightly gave great value to Bukhari's work, Dârimî, on the other hand, shaped the book of knowledge as the largest one in the literature. The dynamism of the concept of knowledge, its difference according to various branches of science, and its change in the historical process are well known. Ahl al-Hadith have revealed their understanding of knowledge, which differed from other schools, within the narration books through narrations. The fact that they opened titles on knowledge in the works in which they compiled the narrations is the product of their effort to present what knowledge is from their own perspectives through the narrations. On the one hand, these chapters reveal what knowledge is, and on the other hand, they express what it is not. In this respect, they also present as content of a refutation to the Ahl al-Ra’y school in the period. This study aims to reveal the common or different aspects of the two authors' understanding of knowledge through the relevant chapters of the two works. Conclusion will be reached by comparing the number of hadiths, their types, subject content, and the titles of the chapters within the works. The article reveals that while the two authors' understanding of knowledge is fundamentally similar, there are also areas where they differ in terms of their choice of topics, the narrations they use, and the titles of the chapters.
Alan : İlahiyat
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Makale Detay 
Benzer Makaleler
PDF Görüntüle
Dergi Bilgisi
Eseri Dinleyin
Alıntı Yap
Bu Sayfayı Yazdırın
Paylaş
Mendeley
