Views
19
Downloands
1
Bu çalışma, şehirlerarası otobüs seçimlerini değerlendirmek için hibrit bir çok kriterli karar verme (MCDM) modeli önermektedir. Önerilen model üç aşamadan oluşmaktadır. Birinci aşamada hazırlık süreci yürütülürken, ikinci aşamada kriterlerin ağırlıkları hesaplanmakta ve üçüncü aşamada alternatiflerin tercih dereceleri belirlenmektedir. Kriter ağırlıklarını belirlemek için Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHP) ve CRITIC (Kriterler Arası Korelasyon Yoluyla Kriter Önemi) uygulanmıştır. Daha sonra, karar alternatiflerinin tercih derecelerini belirlemek için EDAS (Ortalama Çözümden Uzaklığa Dayalı Değerlendirme) tekniği uygulanmıştır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre en belirleyici kriterler estetik ve konfordur. Ayrıca P14 Brand-TE Safari 13 HD’nin en iyi alternatif olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.
This study suggests a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model consisting of three stages to evaluate the choice of cross-city bus alternatives. The CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method is used to calculate the weight of criteria, while the EDAS (The Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution) method is used to calculate the relative value of decision alternatives and to classify alternatives. As a result, the cross-city bus selection process has been observed as the most affected by the Aesthetic and Comfort criteria, the first place among the choice alternatives is Mark-TE Safari 13HD. It is also believed that the alternatives in the top six can also be chosen as rational tools.
This study suggests a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model for evaluating the intercity bus selections. the proposed model consists of three phases. While in the first phase, the preparation process is carried out, in the second phase, the weights of the criteria are calculated and preference ratings of the alternatives are determined in the third phase. To identify the criteria weights the Analitik Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) have been implemented. Next, EDAS (The Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution) technique has been applied to determine the preference ratings of the decision alternatives. According to results of the analysis, the most determinative criteria are asthetic and compfort. Also, it has been observed that P14 Brand-TE Safari 13 HD is the best alternative.
Journal Type : Uluslararası
Article Detail 
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Cite
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
