Özet:

People want to keep their lives in the best conditions of life. This desire is also associated with the elevation of the level of well-being people have better living conditions. By developing policies for their countries in the world to good well-being conditions, they want to implement policies that will bring their country to the highest levels in the world’s well-being rankings. During the study of the field’s summer studies, GDP indicators have been used for many years to rank well-being levels. Over time, the country’s well-being level is not sufficient to determine only national income, so a new set of social indicators has begun to be used. In this context, the OECD first proposed a new well-being index in May 2011 called the "Better Life Index". The recommended index consists of ten main dimensions. These dimensions are made up of variables that represent the quality of life and income in the country in order to explain prosperity. In this study, the OECD’s Better Life Index (Better Life Index) was re-calculated by evaluating in the framework of expert opinions. The SWARA method has been used to emphasize the main and lower criteria of the indicators. Countries under the DICE have been evaluated using the COPRAS method. There is a separate calculation for both ten main criteria and for all criteria. The study conducted a spearman rho line/rank correlation analysis to identify the relationship between the model used in the study and the OECD model. When compared the two models in the results of the analysis, a strong (positive) relationship was seen between them.

Anahtar Kelimeler: