Abstract:

Necip Mahfûz (1911-2006) is a famous Egyptian novelist. He was even more recognised by receiving the Nobel Prize in Literature. The writer’s literary products have been translated into Turkish as well as in many languages. The writer has attracted his interest in academic environments. The author has given special attention to symbolic uses and has given his criticism especially in these stories. The writer's novels are usually translated from English to Turkish. The translators who performed their translation work caused significant losses. But the translation we will study in this article has provided the equivalent of the translation from the source language to the male language. However, considering that the translations made in Turkey are made from inter-language English, we see that the translations made in formal and dynamic equality are not provided and that the non-equality is priorized by the translators. I recommend the non-equality strategy and I am implementing it in this article. The meaning of the original text means an effort to translate the male language in the translation equality and inequality come to the beginning of the basic elements in the translation. It is also inevitable to use some strategies for translations to be successful. In literary text translations, the translator should not only be satisfied with equivalence, but should be able to transmit the source text message in the most natural way from functional, style, communication and cultural aspects to the target language. For this purpose, the six translations of Necib Mahfûz are compared to a dozen sentences in terms of equality and the different places are studied within the framework of equality and inequality strategies. Google translation has also been added to these translations in order to create awareness. When the translation of el-Lıss and'l Kilâb is studied, adaptation and localization, addition, perspective shift (place change) formal equality, dynamic equality and communication translation strategies are seen to be successfully applied in the translation of Rahmi Er. Mr. Rahmi Er has achieved great success in implementing these strategies. But it does not seem possible to say the same thing for the translation of Avi Pardo from the inter-language. Avi Pardo, because of his ignorance of the Arabic, has preferred the non-equality with his translation from English.

Keywords: