Özet:

This study focuses on a comparison between the sherls of the work of Abu Hanife, named al-Fıkhü’l-ekber, to justify the assumption that the sherlin is not a repeating text, but a type of authorship that exceeds the text. He is the one who has the right to do so, and he is the one who has the right to do so, and he is the one who has the right to do so. Among them, the name of El-Fıkhü’l-ekber is more on the front plan. Therefore, it is necessary that al-Fıkhü’l-ekber, especially in the Ottoman period, has been honoured many times. We have made our complaints with the Holy Qur’an and the Holy Qur’an and the Holy Qur’an and the Holy Qur’an and the Holy Qur’an and the Holy Qur’an and the Holy Qur’an. We recorded our work with specific topics in the related charges because the analysis of the four charges on all topics will exceed the size of the article. In the article, a comparative analysis method will be followed on the charges mentioned to al-Fıkhü'l-ekber. As a result, we aim to reveal the value of the works in terms of the literary backgrounds, the tradition of the honor and the Ottoman literary tradition that reflect the charities of different authorities on the same text. In addition, considering the biographies of the mutilators, we will also find some possible conclusions about the talks and tasavvuf encounters in the al-Fıkhü'l-ekber sherh.

Anahtar Kelimeler: