Citation Number
3
Views
33
Downloands
8
Devletlerin uluslararası sistemdeki varlıkları sahip oldukları ekonomik, askeri ve sosyolojik olguların yanı sıra, bu olguların oluşumu sırasında gösterdikleri reflekslerle paralel biçimde ilerlemektedir. Devletlerin dış sınırlarını çevreleyen miğfer konumundaki bu refleksler, diğer aktörlerin faaliyetlerinden önce göz önünde bulunduracağı temel göstergelerin başında gelmektedir. Bu doğrultuda çalışmada ele alınan ihtilaflar, Asya-Pasifik Bölgesi içerisinde yer alan, “Güney Çin Denizi” olarak adlandırılan bölgenin kıyısında bulanan ülkeleri kapsamakta ve özelde bu ülkelerden biri olan Çin Halk Cumhuriyeti’nin 2016 yılında sonuçlanan Tahkim Mahkemesi kararının ardından revize ettiği Güney Çin Denizi stratejisini kapsamaktadır. Kapsam doğrultusunda, bu çalışmada öncelikle Güney Çin Denizi’nin konumuna ve tarihine değinilecek bu sırada kronolojik olarak ülkelerin bölgeye yönelik iddiaları açıklanacak ve nihai politikaları değerlendirilecektir. Ardından Çin’in Güney Çin Denizi’ne yönelik iddialarının kapsamına ve bu iddiaların tahkim kararının ardından ortaya çıkan Four Sha Doktriniyle hangi yöne evrildiğine yanıt aranacaktır.
The existence of states in the international system progresses in parallel with the economic, military and sociological facts they have, as well as with the reflections they show during the formation of these facts. These reflections in the position of the states surrounding their external borders are the main indicators that other actors will consider before their activities. The disputes discussed in this study cover the countries situated on the coast of the "South China Sea" region within the Asia-Pacific Region, and in particular the South China Sea Strategy, which the People's Republic of China, one of these countries, revised after the arbitration court ruling concluded in 2016. According to the scope, this study will first refer to the location and history of the South China Sea, while chronologically the claims of the countries towards the region will be explained and the final policies will be evaluated. It will then be sought to respond to the scope of China’s claims against the South China Sea and to the direction in which these claims evolved by the Four Sha Doctrine, which emerged after the arbitration.
Presence of states in international system goes hand in hand with their economic, military and sociological endowments as well as the reflexes the states shown in formation process of those endowments. Those reflexes, which can be regarded as galeas surrounding the outer borders of the one and only actor of the international system that are states, must be taken into consideration as main indicator before gazing at the moves of those states. In this respect, the disputes we have dealt with in our study cover the countries located in the Asia-Pacific Region, called in ‘South China Sea’ and specially it includes the South China Sea strategy, which was revised by the People's Republic of China, one of these countries, following the decision of the Arbitration Court in 2016. At this cover in this study, firstly the position and history of South China Sea will be mentioned. At the same time, the claims of the countries towards the region will be explained chronologically and the final policies will be evaluated. Subsequently, will be sought answers to the scope of China's claims to the South China Sea and to the direction in which these claims evolved with the Four Sha Doctrine that emerged after the arbitration decision.
Field : Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
