Abstract:

Art and visual arts are one of the important contents of the internet. A media that is dominated by the image culture has entered our living space with television. In the world of television, the realization of famous art and artist design began primarily with the construction of the audience. The same arrangement has changed place in recent years with the spread of social networks and the increased use of social media. So that, in the time range we are in, the Internet and the devices that we qualify as a necessity of the age, the applications, on the other hand, lead to the visual art content being determined by the audience and accepted according to the perception of pleasure. It is at this point that the purpose of this work is to make an analytical assessment of the image engineering with the construction of the audience/followers. The problem appears to be the loss of the quality that is formed through the use of the internet and social media through the effects of the image culture reflected on visual arts. Under the sovereignty of the images, a kind of living need spread through the social media - not dependency - has been transformed into a viewers or followers building, with it, the entrance to the field of existence with the image, the state of preservation of its existence has provided a situation that continues to disrupt the system of visual communication and the field of visual arts has been hit with virtual reality. Therefore, the image, image, digital and virtual visual editions and visual art works have become normalized, normalized and a kind of consumption material by interfering with the internet visuals. Is it possible to build a qualified, dezenformation-distant art field formed by the art-artist-analysing triangle instead of the audience/followers building with the form of the media called "social" through the devices? How can this study, not only in academic scale, be continued with the teachings of aesthetic anxiety and artistic criticism of the works of visual arts or plastic arts – even if they are on the basis of “no” – and not underestimated by the “image is everything” in order to get rid of the “image is everything”? A discussion on the question.

Keywords: