Özet:

This study aims at examining the most ımportant linguistic phenomena of sentence change, according to what grammarians and rhetoricians call the terms of “origin” and “off origin” showing their methods in analysis and the resultant problematic issues. The study follows the grammatical problem, it is genesis, directions. And it is final resolution. Many different distortion, excesses and aberrations in the interpretation and analysis of problem, both modern and old, are shown. Given examples from the Quran, poetry and proverbs are substantiated to clarify and point this grammatical change. This study shows how context is to be considered the cannon for what could be considered correct, rather than the grammatical craftsman. The main findings of this research can be summarized as follows: 1- Some scholars have taken the term "origin" as a way to achieve the regularity of the grammatical system through the response of the current types of sentence that have emerged from the origin to their most common or common origin, while others have made it a criterion or a criterion that measured the uniqueness of some of the current sentence types, And were able to identify the differences between them. 2- The study showed that some of the grammar and grammar of the grammarians and grammarians have been disrupted in the determination of the original and what is out of it, in the interest of the grammatical industry, even at the expense of the meaning, and what is required by the maqam and the consequent exclusion of some of the explicit methods required by the maqam , Or to add words and tools uttered by the context, and does not reveal the meaning, and aborts the place, towards the assessment (may) with the past, and the assessment of the beginner with the present associated with the wow, and appreciation of the wow in the nominal sentence. It was the concept of wrestling, ie, the foreplay of the present verb of the actor's name in time, the significance of the event and its effect, and the rivalry of the actor's name for the act at hand. As well as the concept of comparison, ie the comparison of the content of the case has not made it a constraint in time, and this is not - in some - except in the name of the actor, and in the current act similar to the name of the actor, to show them on the present time appropriate for the situation without the other times, I have made some of them behave this course in the interpretation and exclusion of the rhetoric of the methods. If the interpretation is an original approach in the linguistic thought of the grammarians, interpreters, and philosophers in general, no one can compete with them, especially in the interpretation of the Holy Qur'an, it is acceptable to him not at the expense of the meaning and its artistic value, especially since some of these interpretations are contradictory among themselves. Towards an unacceptable. From about the deletion without requiring the title to do so. 3- Deep in the place in which they appear, and were able to trade different meanings according to the composition of the phrase, and reached great results in their analysis. 4- This study can open the door to reconsider many of the interpretation of the grammarians that do not fit with the requirements of the place, in their interpretations of the Koran and Arabic poetry, and other arts of different say. This is the case with many of the linguists and interpreters, who took the course of the grammarians in interpreting the various texts; to expel them from al-Qa'idah, or because of the intolerance of a certain group, as in the case of the visual and the Caucasian, The grammatical approach is the reason for the closure of what each group says, and the commitment to what they say is the same as the powerful force. And almost do not find out from the scholars on the words of his group in the interpretation and interpretation only rare. Therefore, openness should be opened to the rereading of the ancient scientific heritage of the ancients, and to the use of various annotations and annotations. Some commentators have been able to criticize many inherited linguistic interpretations and to provide linguistic technical analyzes of great importance and relevance to the denominator contained therein. Therefore, I suggest that the scholars reconsider their rulings on these footnotes as a matter of pale heritage, without having to study and analyze them, and reconsider this uncritical critical linguistic heritage.

Anahtar Kelimeler: