Özet:

The article that discusses the issue of culturality as an element of representative thought; the (one) concept in the claim that it represents reality with the concept of conceptualization is in an attempt to match it with a good hole crawler by wrapping the top or by falling down the bottom. As the most suitable method for this excavation activity, Foucault's archaeology was also chosen. For the archaeological method does not carry an out-of-historic claim on the truth, does not impose on the object the compulsory force of the method, it understands the object in its own unity, and, most importantly, it thinks and thinks that the truth is not more than an invention. This archaeological study through the concept of culture tries to reveal the difference between the meaning of the concept used today and the etymological origin and to understand within its unity. Thus, the problem-related relationship of the concepts he invented and applied to with things will be revealed when he is in the activity of understanding what is around. Conceptualization is for the purpose of the thought of truth, based on absolute, which is not more than an invention, while ultimately subjects to the universe. The article reveals the intolerance of the dicotomic thinking action operated as a product of the representative effort of truth, as in the nature-cultural distinction, while acts according to the approach known as structural in the social science world. In a representative thought, the truth is actually representable, presenting itself to the observer as an object of manifestation. The building of the understanding of truth on the principles of absolute, immutable, stable, universal, with Platon's greatness, makes an idealist representation inevitable. In essence, thought efforts such as conceptualization, abstraction and generalization also mean idealization by separating from the context of the material, unique and unique. For the representative thought, depending on the idea that truth is rational, it can be said that the human mind can understand the essence of things, and therefore represent them in thought. In this way, it is a thought that seeks to keep realism in its hands, that blesses, that tries with all its strength to proclaim its divine absolute. In the end, the representative mechanism is operated for the purpose of establishing the rule. The difference between the representative and the form represented is ultimately a product of a human-centric perspective. Thanks to this distinction, it is inevitable that everything except the observer's essence becomes an examination object. This point of view, which is believed to be unique and universal, requires the fixation of the examination object. It can be said that today’s language, religion, race, and gender are not based on differences in the world’s agenda, and that the idea represents the ideal of absolute truth in its origins. As a product of representative thought, it is necessary to categorize two categories based on separation, such as nature and culture, but the concept realism that imitates a direct relationship between thought and the external world is a state of alienation in which everything about man comes out of being his own and is used against it. The distance between the representative and the representative becomes possible, in fact, is nothing more than alienation. For the root problem of the world and the people of the world since Platonism, it can be said that the transformation and metalization have become almost universalised enough to seem like natural, organic beings and forms. The attempt to impose a framework on reality by the representative thought that is imprisoned into the external reality within the conceptual world, breaks the connection with reality, and, in addition, with its guidance by concepts and abstractions, iron caves are put around man. The persistence of the Western thought in representation, right or wrong, was a radical result of the disappearance of the certainty about reality, whether accepted or not. From today, the world of thought has evolved from the representation of the truth, which implies the idea that there is an obligatory connection between the order of things and the order of words, to the representation of the truth, where the limit between reality and image is deleted, where reality is aesthetically transformed into images, and where society is finally culturally transformed. With the entrance to the cultural period, in the postmodern period everything is cultural, consensual. Everything becomes cultural and the naturalization of the culture, while I oppose, produces naturalization again. Culturalism is a hegemonic approach that individuals define by their own cultures, that these cultures form closed, organic whole, and that the individual cannot leave his own culture, but can realize only within himself. It creates and imposes its own reality, such as the concepts that are our own inventions and the ideologies that act as a closed circle.

Anahtar Kelimeler: