Özet:

Transivity - intransivity showing the predicate-object relations, should be taken as a lexical distinction because the existing innate qualities in verb. Language units that are affected by the action done by verb, neither just used with {-I} / {-Ø} suffixes nor show every noun and pronoun conjugated with {-I} / {-Ø} suffixes affected by action. The surface structure of the object is not required to mention from transivity. Transitive verb also necessitates the exclusion of text of unit affected by the action. Voice suffixes taken by verb lead to this. {-l}, {-n}, {-ş} suffixes undertake the function of obscuring and excluding text to unit affected by the action. To call as transitive suffixes to {-t}, {-r}, {-DIr} suffixes organizing subject-predicate relation is not true, because this suffixes require existing both causer and doer in sentence. Semantic roles are semantic relations linking their members to a predicate or verb. Semantic roles derived from verb meaning, express semantic function the participants are installed. Therefore, into sentence in control of predicate which that element which will come with suffixes is determined by semantic, syntactic and pragmatic rules. In Turkish is that dominant theory of the case, even though the different construct, which undertaken grammatical role element as that a language unit in system, determined through case suffixes. It is undertaken the object task with case suffixes to also language unit showing element affected by verb, like all elements. It should not matter, which received case suffixes of language units that are affected by the action done by verb. Object is also coded other case indices expect common case indices of traditional grammar. Verbs affected by action / received object, should be considered transitive whichever conjugate by noun conjugation suffixes. Verbs received these suffixes, should be transitive when nouns / pronouns received {-DAn}, {-A}, {-DA} {-lA} suffixes undertake the object task.

Anahtar Kelimeler: