Özet:

This study aimed at making a semiotic comparison of the principles of Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi's interpretation and its limits. The nature of the paper necessitated employing a methodology that was based on comparison that surveyed the semiotic similarities for Ibn Arabi's interpretational views. The paper was based on a hypothesis claimed that the semiotic interpretation agrees with the Akbar sophist interpretation in many interpretational views. This paper also sought to present an attempt of a comprehensive vision for the interpretational views of these two approaches. Also, the paper tried to bridge the gap between the Gnostic sophistic interpretation and the methodological semiotic one by means of studying the semantic structure for Ibn Arab that was represented in the triangle: utterance, understanding and knowing and comparing it with the semantic semiotic triangle which was represented by sign, signifier and signified. Moreover, the paper studied the limits of interpretation that were represented in multi-understandings, meanings and conditions that separate the acceptable interpretation from the incorrect interpretation for the two interpretational approaches. and approaches. Also, the paper tried to bridge the gap between the Gnostic sophistic interpretation and the methodological semiotic one by means of studying the semantic structure for Ibn Arab that was represented in the triangle: utterance, understanding and knowing and comparing it with the semantic semiotic triangle which was represented by sign, signifier and signified. Moreover, the paper studied the limits of interpretation that were represented in multi-understandings, meanings and conditions that separate the acceptable interpretation from the incorrect interpretation for the two interpretational approaches.

Anahtar Kelimeler: