In the study, it was accepted that social media radiated ideas and arguments, and marginal ideas constitute a barrier to critical public-rational negotiations, and that social media thus reproduces the contradictions that arise in the social structure more sharply and exclusively. On the basis of this acceptance, the argument was dealt with by Laclau and Mouffe, who defended the agonistic society, with the potential to criticize the social media in view of the sharpening nature of social blocs, the glue that holds society together rather than the formation of social disorder. In particular, the contradictions that deepened, sharpened and transformed into conflicts between the social segments in Turkey through power were regarded as dynamics that held society at the same time as widely accepted. The social media has been debating a critical potential holding the opposition and holding society together. This debate has been addressed through the recent "Presidentship" debate on social media. As a result of the examination, the result is reached; power, social media and marginalized social ideas are not solving and social function towards a partnership, social media such as facebook, tiwitter etc. do not deepen contrary to the claimed unequal social structure and radically reproduce existing antagonisms.
Alan : Eğitim Bilimleri; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|