Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 47
 Görüntüleme 110
 İndirme 58
İşbirlikli Öğrenme Yönteminin Okuduğunu Anlama Stratejilerinin Kullanımı ve Okumaya Yönelik Tutum Üzerindeki Etkileri
2006
Dergi:  
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi
Yazar:  
Özet:

The purpose of this research is to study effects of cooperative learning on primary school students' reading comprehension strategy use and attitudes towards reading. Pre-test and post-test experimental design with control group was employed for the research. A cooperative learning technique “Learning Together” was used in the experimental group and traditional teaching methods in the control group. Data was collected through Reading Comprehension Strategy Scale and Attitudes Towards Reading Scale. Mean, standard deviation and t-test were utilized in data analysis. Research results indicate that cooperative learning method is more effective than traditional methods on reading comprehension strategy use. In addition, it has been found out that the students in the cooperative learning group used reading comprehension strategies more often than those in traditional group. Findings have also revealed that cooperative learning made significant differences on attitudes measured by subscales of “Affective Effects of Reading” and “General Views About Reading”. Summary Reading comprehension is the second of 21 “top priority” subjects chosen by more than 100.000 respondents of a questionnaire administered in five continents of the world for 20 years (Buzan, 2001). Improving reading comprehension and increasing its effectiveness depends on use of serious comprehension strategies and building up positive attitudes towards reading. This indicates necessity of nontraditional methods to teach reading comprehension. Because reading is not only vocalizing written words; being able to read, especially being able to comprehend requires some mental activities beyond seeing. For this reason, a reader should understand the ideas in the text, comprehend connections among ideas, organize them comparing with his/her prior knowledge and select those he/she wants to retain in memory (Adalı, 2003; Dökmen, 1994). Briefly speaking, a special care should be given to reading comprehension in schools. Unfortunately, reading comprehension efforts in our country cannot reach its real objectives. Young children who starts the school excitedly and motivated to read, lose those feelings within time, and begin to read only compulsory things to pass the class. One of the major reasons for this situation is traditional methods which suppose that students are passive recipients of knowledge. In traditional classes teachers are in the center of everything and make all the decisions about students learning. In the exam, on the other hand, students are supposed to repeat the text word by word. This pushes students to memorize instead of comprehending. It causes students face difficulties and to develop negative attitudes toward reading. Research results indicate that students don't spend time reading (Balcı, 2003; Batmankaya, 2003; Özen, 2003). For this reason, we need nontraditional methods which help students comprehend, transform, question, criticize and produce creative ideas. This means students are helped to transform from passive receivers into active processors. Cooperative learning which promotes positive attitudes and effective strategy use, can be a possible solution (Açıkgöz, 1996; Brush, 1997; Kosters,1991; Lindquist,1996; McInerney, McInerney ve Marsh, 1997; Okebukola, 1986; Özkal, Yıldız, Altunay ve Tonbul, 2002; Steven ve Slavin, 1995). It is expected to be effective in Turkish classes by improving positive attitudes and strategy use. No research records are available within this context. Therefore, this research aims at investigating effects of cooperative and traditional methods on students' attitudes towards reading and strategy use. Research questions to be answered can be started as: what are the effects of cooperative and traditional method on (1) reading comprehension strategies and, (2) attitudes towards reading. Method Research Model: In this research pre- and post test research design with control group was utilized. One experimental and one control group participated in the research. Participants: Sixth graders (n=56) enrolled to two classes in a state elementary school participated in this research. There were 12 girls and 18 boys in experimental, 12 girls and 14 boys in control group. Their ages ranges between 11-13. Instruments: Data was colleted by Scale of Reading Comprehension Strategy” (SRCS) and Scale of Attitudes toward Reading” (SAR). Cronbach Alpha Reliability estimate for the former is .87, for latter is .85. Procedure: Treatment lasted for 30 class hours in regular class settings and schedule. Same texts were utilized for reading comprehension activities both in experimental and control groups. In control group, whole class instruction was implemented. In experimental group, cooperative learning was combined with active learning tasks such as, painting, story tree, making conclusions, finding mottos, writing poems and songs and asking questions. Data Analysis: Data was analyzed through SPSS. Mean, Standard Deviation and t test were employed in data analysis. Results and Discussion Students in cooperative learning class employ more learning strategies. This result supports other research findings (Açıkgöz, 1996; McInerney, McInerney ve Marsh, 1997; Özkal, Yıldız, Altunay ve Tonbul 2002). Cooperative learning's superiority in strategy use may result from interaction opportunities in cooperative groups. There, students are able to observe each other reading, explaining, questioning, criticizing and thinking aloud. Besides, active learning tasks may promote strategy use by activating students' minds. Shortly, students in cooperative groups do much more than mere reading and answering comprehension question. Cooperative learning fosters positive attitudes in dimensions of Affective of Reading and General views about Reading. It has no significant effects on dimension Effects of Reading on Improvement. This supports other research results (Okebukola, 1986; Kosters, 1991; Steven ve Slavin, 1995; Lindquist, 1996; Brush, 1997; Gömleksiz, 1993; Oral, 1995 ve Sarıtaş, 2000). We need to develop positive attitudes towards reading. It is an urgent need in our country where people lack reading habit, critical reading and prefer TV to reading (Altunay, 2000). If we can promote strategy use and positive attitudes toward reading through cooperative learning, we can also promote high reading achievement which is directly correlated with these variables. Besides, increase in reading achievement will make a good base for learning other subjects effectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler




Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi
Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi