User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
  Citation Number 5
 Views 65
 Downloands 22
HAVAYOLU ŞİRKETLERİNİN LOJİSTİK PERFORMANSLARININ ENTROPİ VE TOPSİS YÖNTEMLERİ KULLANILARAK KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
2019
Journal:  
Journal of Management and Economics Research
Author:  
Abstract:

Bu çalışmada, havayolu şirketlerinin birbirleri arasındaki göreceli lojistik performans düzeylerinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Şirketlerin lojistik performans düzeylerini belirlemek amacıyla, maliyet, verimlilik, servis kalitesi, fiyat ve yönetim boyutları baz alınmış ve bu boyutları temsil eden birim işletme maliyeti, işgücü verimliliği, filo verimliliği, yolcu yük faktörü, zamanında performans, emniyet, uçuş frekansı, ortalama ücret, gelir artışı, net kar marjı, pazar payı alt verileri incelemeye dahil edilmiştir. Veriler, şirketlerin yayınladıkları yıllık finansal tablolardan, Skytrax raporlarından ve açık kaynaklarda yer alan çalışmalardan elde edilmiştir. Kriterlerin ağırlıkları havacılık sektöründe çalışan uzmanlardan alınan görüşler, Shannon Entropi yöntemi ve basit ağırlıklandırma ile belirlenmiştir. Kriterler üç farklı ağırlık oranına göre TOPSIS yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, 1. ve 2. sıradaki şirketlerin sadece 0,01 puanlık bir fark ile değişiklik gösterdiği bunun dışında ise uzman görüşü ve entropi yöntemi ile elde edilen sıralamanın aynı olduğu görülmüştür. Ancak her bir kriterin ağırlığı eşit olarak alındığında alternatiflerin sıralamasının değiştiği gözlemlenmiştir.

Keywords:

HAVAYOLU ŞİRKETLERİNİN LOJİSTİK PERFORMANSLARININ ENTROPİ VE TOPSİS YÖNTEMLERİ KULLANILARAK KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

In this study, a study was conducted to determine the relative logistics performance levels between airline companies. In order to determine the logistics performance levels of companies, the cost, efficiency, service quality, price and management dimensions are based and the unit representing these dimensions is included in the study of operating costs, labour efficiency, fleet efficiency, passenger load factor, timely performance, safety, flight frequency, average wage, income increase, net profit margin, market share subdata. The data is obtained from the company’s annual financial statements, Skytrax reports, and open-source studies. The weights of the criteria are determined by the opinions obtained from experts working in the aviation industry, Shannon Entropi method and simple weighting. The criteria were analyzed using the TOPSIS method according to three different weight ratio. The study found that the companies in the 1st and 2nd rankings varied with a difference of only 0.01 points, but the ranking was the same with the expert opinion and entropic method. However, when the weight of each criterion is taken equally, the ranking of alternatives has been observed.

Comparison Of Logistic Performances Of Airline Companies Using Entropy and Topsis Methods
2019
Author:  
Abstract:

In this study, a research was conducted to determine the relative logistical performance levels of airlines among each other. In order to determine the logistical performance levels of companies, cost, efficiency, service quality, price and management dimensions were taken as basis and unit operating cost, labor productivity, fleet efficiency, passenger load factor, timely performance, safety, flight frequency, income increase, net profit margin, market share sub-data were included in the study. The data was obtained from annual financial statements issued by the companies, from Skytrax reports and from studies in open source. The weights of the criteria were determined by experts from the aviation sector, Shannon Entropy method and simple weighting. The criteria were analyzed using the TOPSIS method for three different weight ratios. As a result of the research, it is seen that the rankings obtained by the expert opinion and entropy method are the same except that the first and second companies vary only by a 0.01 point difference. However, when the weight of each criterion is taken as equal, it is observed that the order of the alternatives is changed.

Keywords:

Citation Owners
Attention!
To view citations of publications, you must access Sobiad from a Member University Network. You can contact the Library and Documentation Department for our institution to become a member of Sobiad.
Off-Campus Access
If you are affiliated with a Sobiad Subscriber organization, you can use Login Panel for external access. You can easily sign up and log in with your corporate e-mail address.
Similar Articles








Journal of Management and Economics Research

Field :   Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 888
Cite : 3.487
Journal of Management and Economics Research