Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
  Atıf Sayısı 1
 Görüntüleme 104
 İndirme 34
18. Yuzyildan 20. Yuzyila Yunanistan’da Dil Sorunu ve Ulusal Bireyin İcadi
2019
Dergi:  
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

The main target of the language question in Greek intellectual life, from the late 18th century to the beginning of the 20th century, is the invention of the national person. These arguments evolve around three axes: to prove that the Greek nation is the heir of the Ancient Hellenic culture, to prove that it has a European identity and to put the Greek irredentist project into effect. The language question that preceded Greek national movement is about how to transfer European thought to the Greek community and how to prove the European identity of the Greeks to Europeans. Fundamentally all of these debates were based on a concept that was essentially created by the sovereign European discourse and cultivated in the sense of slavery-freedom. The Ottoman Empire was perceived as "slavery/yoke" by the 18th century Greek intelligentsia. It was necessary to get rid of this "yoke" as soon as possible. It was thought that education is salvation. The fierce debate at the end of the 19th century is predominantly about how the Greek Megali Idea can be realized. According to this discourse, Greece had Greeks who were outside the borders of the state since its establishment as a national state and were awaiting "rescue". While the intelligentsia was creating a common code with the Greeks of Anatolia over the Orthodox sect, it was trying to create another common code with the Orthodox population of the Balkans on the language. This second group was living in Macedonia, a region that is still troubled. At the end of the 19th century, Greek nationalism undertook the Greekization project of the Orthodox Christian people who lived here and spoke one of the Slavic languages as their mother tongue, by destroying other nationalisms in the region. Thus they tried to create a common code in language. In this context, both the vernacularists and the archaists work to achieve a common goal: to create Greeks from the people of this region. This paper will first focus on the language battle between the Greek speaking Orthodox Christian intellectuals of the Ottoman Empire. Then, it will study the language debates from the 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

18 . The 20th Century. Century In Greece Language Problem and National Individual Disorder
2019
Yazar:  
Özet:

The main target of the language question in Greek intellectual life, from the late 18th century to the beginning of the 20th century, is the invention of the national person. These arguments evolve around three axes: to prove that the Greek nation is the heir of the Ancient Hellenic culture, to prove that it has a European identity and to put the Greek irredentist project into effect. The language question that preceded the Greek national movement is about how to transfer European thought to the Greek community and how to prove the European identity of the Greeks to Europeans. Fundamentally all of these debates were based on a concept that was essentially created by the sovereign European discourse and cultivated in the sense of slavery-freedom. The Ottoman Empire was perceived as "slavery/yoke" by the 18th century Greek intelligentsia. It was necessary to get rid of this "yoke" as soon as possible. It was thought that education is salvation. The fierce debate at the end of the 19th century is predominantly about how the Greek Megali Idea can be realized. According to this discourse, Greece had Greeks who were outside the borders of the state since its establishment as a national state and were waiting for "rescue". While the intelligentsia was creating a common code with the Greeks of Anatolia over the Orthodox sect, it was trying to create another common code with the Orthodox population of the Balkans on the language. This second group was living in Macedonia, a region that is still troubled. At the end of the 19th century, Greek nationalism undertook the Greekization project of the Orthodox Christian people who lived here and spoke one of the Slavic languages as their mother tongue, by destroying other nationalism in the region. Thus they tried to create a common code in language. In this context, both the vernacularists and the archaists work to a common goal: to create Greeks from the people of this region. This paper will first focus on the language battle between the Greek speaking Orthodox Christian intellectuals of the Ottoman Empire. Then, it will study the language debates from the 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Dikkat!
Yayınların atıflarını görmek için Sobiad'a Üye Bir Üniversite Ağından erişim sağlamalısınız. Kurumuzun Sobiad'a üye olması için Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Daire Başkanlığı ile iletişim kurabilirsiniz.
Kampüs Dışı Erişim
Eğer Sobiad Abonesi bir kuruma bağlıysanız kurum dışı erişim için Giriş Yap Panelini kullanabilirsiniz. Kurumsal E-Mail adresiniz ile kolayca üye olup giriş yapabilirsiniz.
Benzer Makaleler








Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi

Alan :   Filoloji

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 722
Atıf : 2.440
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Atıf Dizini