Özet:

While it is expected that the Qur’an and the hadiths, as the two fundamental sources of Islam, support each other, adding some manufactured ones to the second primary source could have formed the basis for peril of being a contradiction between the first and the second primary sources. After the events of fitna, hadiths scholar critics developed various approaches underpinning the methodology of hadiths as opposed to political and religious groups who tried to fabricate lies on behalf of Prophet Mohammed to show that their views are prophetic. Following the breakdown in the unity of the Ummah, sensitivity increased even more towards indiscriminately narrated hadiths and the act of narrating too many hadiths was considered un welcome. For this reason, hadiths scholars have focused on the narratives of eminent narrators together with well-known hadiths. As an example of this situation in the sources of hadith and hadith methodology, the narrative that Ibn Abbas made some narrations narrated by Buşeyr repeated or disregarded them, comes on the front line. It is required to be known if Buseyr himself or the hadiths narrated by himself lay at the root of the attitude of Ibn Abbas, although his reaction is simply usual in a place where manufacturing is quite common. For this reason, after the narrations are evaluated in terms of truthfulness, they will be subject to an interpretation over information which is to be elicited from textual analysis and regarding Buşeyr.

Anahtar Kelimeler: