Kullanım Kılavuzu
Neden sadece 3 sonuç görüntüleyebiliyorum?
Sadece üye olan kurumların ağından bağlandığınız da tüm sonuçları görüntüleyebilirsiniz. Üye olmayan kurumlar için kurum yetkililerinin başvurması durumunda 1 aylık ücretsiz deneme sürümü açmaktayız.
Benim olmayan çok sonuç geliyor?
Birçok kaynakça da atıflar "Soyad, İ" olarak gösterildiği için özellikle Soyad ve isminin baş harfi aynı olan akademisyenlerin atıfları zaman zaman karışabilmektedir. Bu sorun tüm dünyadaki atıf dizinlerinin sıkça karşılaştığı bir sorundur.
Sadece ilgili makaleme yapılan atıfları nasıl görebilirim?
Makalenizin ismini arattıktan sonra detaylar kısmına bastığınız anda seçtiğiniz makaleye yapılan atıfları görebilirsiniz.
 Görüntüleme 41
 İndirme 5
Captives In 18th Century Diplomacy: Austrian Captives In The Ottoman Empire After The Treaty Of Karlowitz
2023
Dergi:  
Türk İslam Medeniyeti Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi
Yazar:  
Özet:

Abstract The 18th century emerges as an era in which the interstate relations of diplomacy emerged in the world. Diplomacy began to rise during the process started after the Treaty of Westphalia, which ended thirty years’ wars. The changing conditions were reflected in the treaties with the Ottoman Empire and the European states. The Treaty of Karlowitz, which was signed after long wars, became a treaty in which this diplomacy was applied. The most important clause of the treaties was the captives of war. In this sense the Treaty of Karlowitz was the beginning. The situation of captives of war was handled mutually and the extradition of captives was included in the treaty text. But there was a problem. A captive of war was also a spoils of war. This was not only true for the Ottoman Empire, but also for the European states. From the moment the spoil was distributed among the soldiers, it was transferred to the property of the person. Interference with personal property was out of the question. In fact, these people could have already sold the captive and even changed a few hands. The state found the solution in paying the cost of the captives to their owners. Thus, the person who took the captive would not be financially damaged. However, there was only one rule in the treaties that was followed by the state. The captive should not have changed his/her religion during this period. If the captive had changed his/her religion that is, accepted Islam, he/she could no longer be returned.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Atıf Yapanlar
Bilgi: Bu yayına herhangi bir atıf yapılmamıştır.
Benzer Makaleler


Türk İslam Medeniyeti Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi

Alan :   Güzel Sanatlar; İlahiyat; Mimarlık, Planlama ve Tasarım; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Dergi Türü :   Ulusal

Metrikler
Makale : 160
Atıf : 172
© 2015-2024 Sobiad Atıf Dizini