Abstract This article analyzes the games of strength as well as the legitimation discourses present in the curriculum debate of Physical Education, focusing on the curriculum of the State of São Paulo. To this end, we conducted a systematic review about the publications dealing with the assignature of Physical Education in this curriculum. The observations made were based on the contributions of Stephen Ball on curriculum policies and Lopes, Macedo and Silva authors of the field of curriculum in Brazil. The research indicates that such publications produce certain regimes of truths through contributory discursive practices, those favorable to the acceptance of the document and the disaprovatives that criticize the official curriculum. However, in common, both allow the defense of a common curriculum in the of School Physical Education.
Dergi Türü : Uluslararası
Benzer Makaleler | Yazar | # |
---|
Makale | Yazar | # |
---|