Özet:

From the prehistoric periods to the present day, housing has been among the basic life needs of mankind. In the process of social development, the change of the view of the concept of housing has caused differences in architectural production and has developed houses with the imagination of the space that can respond to new living conditions. Traditional housing architecture, which is the imitor of the historic city identity of society, is formed parallel to social structures, cultural values, social trends, beliefs systems and historical accumulation and becomes a dynamic phenomenon with its social, social, cultural and historical dimensions. Traditional houses produced in different geographics, in different communities, have an important mission to be a product of the common cultural heritage of society, to create historical memory and to reflect the philosophy of life. The traditional Turkish House, formed by the ideological attitudes, cultural dynamics, social trends, beliefs systems, economic structure, technological level and the experiences of society, and the traditional Turkish House, where the principles of traditional design found the body, has continued to exist for hundreds of years. In this study, the similarities and differences between the architectural design approaches applied in the traditional housing architecture produced in two different communities are aimed at comparing the original value and importance of the two housing traditions. The two traditional housing architecture has been evaluated by evaluating the historical, social, cultural and ideological backgrounds of the design principles and structural characteristics applied from its formation. With the geographical conditions and climate characteristics that influence the formation of the traditional Turkish House and the Japanese House, the physical and functional formations, structural and spatial characteristics and aesthetic wealth of the two household traditions in the context of the traditional life, values judgments and cultural dynamics of the two communities have been revealed. When comparative analysis findings made between the traditional housing architecture of two different societies are assessed, the flexible space philosophy that houses different functions together, the two traditional housing traditions have very close similarities in terms of the details applied in the interior design, the original construction techniques and structural characteristics, the principles applied in the interior organization, and the different qualities of each other.

Anahtar Kelimeler: