Özet:

The press has played an important role in the perception and interpretation of the political life of Turkey. During the one-party period, the presence of a single-voice press was discussed, while the diversity of political parties entered a period in which the press was re-formed. With the transition to the multi-party life, the press that adds colour to the political life, which gains vitality, has gained value as a means of public creation. The Gazette of İzmir was founded on April 12, 1946, when the opposition was re-formed in the city of İzmir. On December 25, 1946, the Democratic Izmir newspaper, which continued its publication life, appeared as the voice of the opposition. This opposite attitude against the one-party regime was the price for the democratic regime to win the business. The opposition statements of the Democratic Izmir newspaper, which rises in the local area of Izmir, have been closely followed by the CHP power with its broadcasting policy while playing an effective role in the creation of the public against the DP. From the first day of its establishment, the Democratic Izmir newspaper has been active as the founder, the publishing staff and the publishing policy that it follows and the semi-official publishing body of the Democratic Party until the end of 1955. The first breakdown between the newspaper and the power appeared in 1950. In the future, the tensions between the DP İzmir and the local government have been added to reasons such as the DP’s unprecedented attitude, anti-democratic laws, the party’s rule and program. As a result of the anti-democratic activities of the DP, which he supported for the operation of the regime in the struggle for democracy, the Democratic Izmir newspaper has now regained the opposition flag as an outcome against power. From the end of 1955, the reflection of the Democratic Izmir newspaper, which rebelled with an opposition to the power of the DP, to the Turkish political life, the publication policy it followed, was revealed by content analysis. The political, social and economic issues of the period were addressed by an opposition press. The press of the newspaper to the opposition and the pressure applied by the power keeps the light at the point of understanding the press history of the period. The Democratic Izmir newspaper has published the banned publication in some way. The case was opened on the grounds that it did not comply with the prohibition of broadcasting, sometimes pages were gathered. In this period, when the power held the pressure power in hand, the press practices against the newspaper were not limited to them, the official announcements were cut off, the paper was missing, the mattress was burned. It was decided to be closed because of the swine language, and the press members were sentenced to prison. In this direction, the newspaper has become one of the rare press bodies closed by both the CHP and the DP power. In short, the Democratic Izmir newspaper is an example of what can happen to an opposition press. If I can say, the Democratic Party has become one of the most read newspapers in the time with the prohibited non-recognized publication policy that the Democratic Izmir newspaper, which is a complete main issue, has become one of the most read newspapers in the time in Izmir. There was also a newspapers from the time back in Izmir. The anti-democratic practice of the Democratic Party's power ended with a military intervention on 27 May 1960. As one of the most attracted newspapers from the power of the Democratic Party, Democratic Izmir saw May 27 as a liberation. The Democratic Izmir newspaper, which is the defender of the May 27 movement in İzmir, has succeeded in the struggle against the DP power, along with the intervention. In the 1960s, when speech for the DP was prohibited, he tried to justify the intervention by criticizing the Democratic Party hardly almost every day and to pay public money. One of the cases in the law, the Democratic Izmir Gazette Case, in the days of continuing, used the power of public creation to execute the Democratic Parties. In the course of the trial, he was revoked by the hard broadcasting policy of the DP. The court claims that his cases should be immediately ruled and that political prisoners should be executed. It is indeed the idea that the long-term proceedings and the intervention will lose its legitimacy in the public domain. The judgment ended and the sentence was sentenced to death by saying, “There was one, there was no one.”

Anahtar Kelimeler: