Citation Number
1
Views
17
Downloands
2
Hizmet sözleşmesiyle taraflar iş görme ve ücret ödeme asli edim borçlarının yanında birtakım yan edim borçlarını da yerine getirmek zorundadır. Bu yan edim borçlarından birisi de işçinin rekabet etmeme borcudur. İşçinin rekabet etmeme borcu hizmet sözleşmesi devam ederken sadakat borcunun bir uzantısı olarak, hizmet sözleşmesi sona erdikten sonra ise işçi ile işveren arasında yapılan rekabet yasağı sözleşmesiyle ortaya çıkar. Bu sözleşme ile işçi işverene karşı herhangi bir biçimde rekabet etmemeyi, rakip bir işletme açmamayı ve rakip bir işletmede çalışmamayı veya rakip işletmelerle menfaat ilişkisine girmemeyi üstlenmektedir. Hizmet sözleşmesinde rekabet yasağının amacı sözleşme devam ederken veya sözleşme sona erdikten sonra işveren ile işçinin ekonomik yarışa girişmesine engel olarak işverenin haklı menfaatlerini ve işverenin mevcut iş potansiyelini korumaktır. İşçinin rekabet yasağını ihlal etmesi durumunda işveren hizmet sözleşmesini sona erdirebilecek ve uğradığı bütün zararların giderilmesini isteyebilecektir. Çalışmada kanun tarafından düzenlenen hizmet sözleşmesinde rekabet yasağı ve ihlalini taraflar ve genel ilkeler çerçevesinde incelenecektir.
With the service contract, the parties have to fulfill their debt in addition to the original debt for business and payments, and a number of side debt debts. One of these debts is that I must compete with the worker. The employee's competition debt service contract continues while loyalty debt is an extension, and after the service contract is terminated, it occurs by the competition prohibition agreement between the employee and the employer. This contract undertakes the worker not to compete in any way against the employer, not to open a competitive business and not to work in a competitive business or not to enter an interest relationship with the competitive business. The purpose of the prohibition of competition in the service contract is to protect the employer’s legitimate interests and the employer’s existing business potential, as it prevents the employer from entering the economic competition while the contract continues or after the contract is terminated. In the event that the worker violates the competition ban, the employer may terminate the service contract and request the removal of all the damages he suffered. In the study, the law-regulated service contract will examine the prohibition and violation of competition in the framework of the parties and general principles.
The parties have to fulfill some secondary performance obligations as well as the main performance obligations of working and paying wages with the service contract. One of these side performance debts is the employee's non-compete obligation. The non-compete obligation of the worker arises as an extension of the duty of loyalty during the service contract, and after the end of the service contract, with the non-compete agreement between the worker and the employer. With this contract, the employee undertakes not to compete in any way against the employer, not to open a competitor business, not to work in a competitor business or to enter into a relationship of interest with competing businesses. The purpose of the non-competition in the service contract is to protect the employer's rightful interests and the current business potential of the employer by preventing the employer and the employee from entering into an economic race while the contract is in progress or after the contract is terminated. If the employee violates the prohibition of competition, the employer may terminate the service contract and request the elimination of all damages. In the study, the prohibition of competition and its violation in the service contract regulated by the law will be examined within the framework of the parties and general principles.
Field : Hukuk
Journal Type : Ulusal
Article Detail 
Citation Owners
Similar Articles
Download PDF
Journal Information
Listen Paper
Print This Page
Share
Mendeley
