Abstract:

Abstract Administrative fine sanctions are one of the most important practices aimed at ensuring public order. For individuals, traffic fines have a special importance for material and moral losses or health problems that they and others will suffer. Everyone's observance of the predetermined rules in traffic, which is the area of use for the society in general, contributes to the smooth functioning of the system. It is natural for the administration, which is obliged to produce policies regarding the general health problems and order of the society, to envisage penal sanctions regarding traffic rules in order to ensure individual and social deterrence, in case the necessary measures are taken and the measures taken and the rules introduced are not followed. It is of course important for the rule of law that both the justification and the establishment process of traffic fines, which are an administrative sanction, are in compliance with the law. Although the reason for traffic fines is not to obey the traffic rules and to risk both one's own and others' lives, the fines that are imposed will affect the individual economy, let alone the crimes of a judicial nature. Both the legal regulation of traffic fines, which have an important place among administrative fines in the public budget, and the fair treatment in cases where there is a dispute, will be a well-deserved punishment for the citizen and a lawful public income for the administration. In this study, we will try to address the problems encountered during the implementation of traffic fines and the basic principles that the judicial authorities should consider in order to make a decision in accordance with the law and fairness in case of objection to these fines.