Abstract:

This study includes the introduction of the work named ‘at-Tekmîl fil-Usûl’ written by Vecihuddîn Omer b. Abdulmuhsin al-Erzincani as an annotation to Pazdawî's Usûl, which is one of the main works of Hanafi fiqh method and includes evaluations examining the understanding of qiyas. In the field of Islamic law procedure, Vecihuddin Omer b. Abdulmuhsin al-Erzincani The work named et-Tekmîl fil-Usûl written by Abdulmuhsin al-Erzincânî in 726 is one of the manuscripts in this field. It is an annotation to 's Usûl, which is one of the main works of Hanafi fiqh. Erzincânî's work has been described as an exemplary study in the field of fiqh. Although Et-Tekmîl fil-Usûl was written with the method and technique of Pazdawî, it is a work that emerges with Erzincani's unique ideas, views, examples, and evaluations from time to time. After citing Pazdawi's text, Erzincani states his opinions, thoughts, and evaluations, starting with the words ‘I’d say, too’. He emphasizes that qiyas is definitely included in the law based on a wisdom, and one of the methods of understanding and comprehending the decrees of the shar'i is qiyas. In the work, it is explained with justification that qiyas is one aspect of the original and another aspect of the analogy. Qiyas has been evaluated as fer’, since the Qur'an did not make any provision like sunnah and ijma at the beginning. Since the book, the sunnah and the consensus are solid proof, and qiyas is conjectural evidence, it has been examined in the fourth place apart from the three solid proofs. The field of our study is the qiyas part of the work named at-Tekmîl fil-Usûl. The reason why we do such a study is to examine how the chapter of qiyas is handled in terms of Islamic law procedure in Erzincani's work and to determine its parallel and different approaches to the traditional method.

Keywords: