User Guide
Why can I only view 3 results?
You can also view all results when you are connected from the network of member institutions only. For non-member institutions, we are opening a 1-month free trial version if institution officials apply.
So many results that aren't mine?
References in many bibliographies are sometimes referred to as "Surname, I", so the citations of academics whose Surname and initials are the same may occasionally interfere. This problem is often the case with citation indexes all over the world.
How can I see only citations to my article?
After searching the name of your article, you can see the references to the article you selected as soon as you click on the details section.
 Views 15
 Downloands 5
INVESTIGATION OF EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS AND THINKING STYLES OF PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORT TEACHERS
2022
Journal:  
International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture
Author:  
Abstract:

The aim of this study is investigating physical education and sports teachers’ epistemological beliefs and their thinking styles in terms of several variables and finding out the relation between aforementioned concepts. The study was conducted with the relational scanning model, one of the quantitative research methods with 268 physical education and sports teachers working at different school stages and chosen through simple random sampling. “Epistemological Belief Scale” adapted in Turkish by Deryakulu and Bıkmaz (2003) and “Thinking Styles Inventory” adapted in Turkish by Buluş (2003) were used to gather data. Independent sample t-test, One-Way ANOVA, and Pearson correlation test were used for analysis. The findings of the study showed that while professional experience of physical education and sports teachers, the school stage at which they worked, and the place of their work residence didn’t cause statistically meaningful differences between groups in terms of teachers’ epistemological beliefs and thinking styles, gender variable caused statistically meaningful differences related to “legislative” and “judicial” thinking styles and “scientific epistemic” belief. Also, reading habit variable caused statistically meaningful differences related to “judicial”, “monarchic”, “oligarchic”, global”, “external”, “liberal” thinking styles and their scientific epistemological beliefs. At the end of the study, a meaningful relationship between total scores of “Epistemological Belief Scale” and “Thinking Styles Inventory” and “legislative”, “executive”, judicial”, hierarchic,”, “anarchic”, “local”, “liberal”, “conservative” sub scale scores were found at a moderate level. Also, a meaningful relationship between total scores of the scales and “monarchic”, “oligarchic”, “global”, “internal”, external” sub scale scores at low level. According to the findings of the study, the teachers who participated in the current study had strong conservative epistemological beliefs. It is recommended that some courses such as nature of science and scientific knowledge should be taken into graduate programmes as compulsory courses, and collaborating with MoNE and universities, some in-service training programmes to enhance teachers ‘epistemological beliefs should be designed for physical education teachers who are attributed as source of knowledge and guide to get knowledge. Also, it is recommended that some courses related to nature of science should be taken into high and secondary school curriculums. Besides, to enable the teachers have different thinking styles, some in- and post- service training programmes should be developed, and teachers should be encouraged to take part in these programmes.

Keywords:

0
2022
Author:  
Citation Owners
Information: There is no ciation to this publication.
Similar Articles










International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture

Field :   Eğitim Bilimleri; Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler

Journal Type :   Uluslararası

Metrics
Article : 385
Cite : 213
International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture